Blake Gella

Blake Gella, Wei Wu, Yuhao Yin et al.

Recommender systems trained on user interaction data are susceptible to behavioral intensity imbalance--a systematic distortion arising from heterogeneous engagement patterns across users. This imbalance skews feedback signals such that observed interactions no longer faithfully reflect true preferences, causing models to disproportionately amplify signals from highly active users while underrepresenting others, which ultimately degrades recommendation quality and robustness at scale. To address this issue, we propose a nonparametric contrastive percentile approximation framework, PEARL, that models relative preference signals instead of absolute engagement magnitudes. Building upon relative advantage debiasing, PEARL leverages real contrastive interaction samples to approximate percentile relationships directly, without relying on auxiliary distribution estimation models. We provide theoretical justification demonstrating that such pairwise comparisons yield unbiased estimates of percentile-based preference signals. For broader applicability, we introduce a prediction-based bootstrapping mechanism for percentile smoothing to handle sparse and discrete feedback, alongside a generalized value-weighted formulation and a co-training strategy to enhance both modeling flexibility and representation learning. Extensive offline experiments demonstrate that PEARL effectively mitigates behavioral bias and consistently improves recommendation performance across multiple ranking targets. Deployed in a production livestream platform with a combined user base of billions, online A/B testing confirms substantial real-world gains: +2.10% Watch Duration, +0.80% Consumption Amount, +1.49% Interaction Rate, and -6.91% Report Rate.

Blake Gella, Howard Zhang, Rishi Upadhyay et al.

The introduction of large, foundational models to computer vision has led to drastically improved performance on the task of semantic segmentation. However, these existing methods exhibit a large performance drop when testing on images degraded by weather conditions such as rain, fog, or snow. We introduce a general paired-training method that can be applied to all current foundational model architectures that leads to improved performance on images in adverse weather conditions. To this end, we create the WeatherProof Dataset, the first semantic segmentation dataset with accurate clear and adverse weather image pairs, which not only enables our new training paradigm, but also improves the evaluation of the performance gap between clear and degraded segmentation. We find that training on these paired clear and adverse weather frames which share an underlying scene results in improved performance on adverse weather data. With this knowledge, we propose a training pipeline which accentuates the advantages of paired-data training using consistency losses and language guidance, which leads to performance improvements by up to 18.4% as compared to standard training procedures.

Blake Gella, Howard Zhang, Rishi Upadhyay et al.

We propose a method to infer semantic segmentation maps from images captured under adverse weather conditions. We begin by examining existing models on images degraded by weather conditions such as rain, fog, or snow, and found that they exhibit a large performance drop as compared to those captured under clear weather. To control for changes in scene structures, we propose WeatherProof, the first semantic segmentation dataset with accurate clear and adverse weather image pairs that share an underlying scene. Through this dataset, we analyze the error modes in existing models and found that they were sensitive to the highly complex combination of different weather effects induced on the image during capture. To improve robustness, we propose a way to use language as guidance by identifying contributions of adverse weather conditions and injecting that as "side information". Models trained using our language guidance exhibit performance gains by up to 10.2% in mIoU on WeatherProof, up to 8.44% in mIoU on the widely used ACDC dataset compared to standard training techniques, and up to 6.21% in mIoU on the ACDC dataset as compared to previous SOTA methods.