Songxiang Gu

Donghui Yan, Songxiang Gu, Ying Xu et al.

Similarity plays a fundamental role in many areas, including data mining, machine learning, statistics and various applied domains. Inspired by the success of ensemble methods and the flexibility of trees, we propose to learn a similarity kernel called rpf-kernel through random projection forests (rpForests). Our theoretical analysis reveals a highly desirable property of rpf-kernel: far-away (dissimilar) points have a low similarity value while nearby (similar) points would have a high similarity}, and the similarities have a native interpretation as the probability of points remaining in the same leaf nodes during the growth of rpForests. The learned rpf-kernel leads to an effective clustering algorithm--rpfCluster. On a wide variety of real and benchmark datasets, rpfCluster compares favorably to K-means clustering, spectral clustering and a state-of-the-art clustering ensemble algorithm--Cluster Forests. Our approach is simple to implement and readily adapt to the geometry of the underlying data. Given its desirable theoretical property and competitive empirical performance when applied to clustering, we expect rpf-kernel to be applicable to many problems of an unsupervised nature or as a regularizer in some supervised or weakly supervised settings.

Donghui Yan, Zhiwei Qin, Songxiang Gu et al.

Many applications require the collection of data on different variables or measurements over many system performance metrics. We term those broadly as measures or variables. Often data collection along each measure incurs a cost, thus it is desirable to consider the cost of measures in modeling. This is a fairly new class of problems in the area of cost-sensitive learning. A few attempts have been made to incorporate costs in combining and selecting measures. However, existing studies either do not strictly enforce a budget constraint, or are not the `most' cost effective. With a focus on classification problem, we propose a computationally efficient approach that could find a near optimal model under a given budget by exploring the most `promising' part of the solution space. Instead of outputting a single model, we produce a model schedule -- a list of models, sorted by model costs and expected predictive accuracy. This could be used to choose the model with the best predictive accuracy under a given budget, or to trade off between the budget and the predictive accuracy. Experiments on some benchmark datasets show that our approach compares favorably to competing methods.