Daniel Lakey

Christopher Goetze, Tim Schlippe, Daniel Lakey

Spacecraft anomaly detection is critical for mission safety, yet deploying sophisticated models on-board presents significant challenges due to hardware constraints. This paper investigates three approaches for spacecraft telemetry anomaly detection -- forecasting & threshold, direct classification, and image classification -- and optimizes them for edge deployment using multi-objective neural architecture optimization on the European Space Agency Anomaly Dataset. Our baseline experiments demonstrate that forecasting & threshold achieves superior detection performance (92.7% Corrected Event-wise F0.5-score (CEF0.5)) [1] compared to alternatives. Through Pareto-optimal architecture optimization, we dramatically reduced computational requirements while maintaining capabilities -- the optimized forecasting & threshold model preserved 88.8% CEF0.5 while reducing RAM usage by 97.1% to just 59 KB and operations by 99.4%. Analysis of deployment viability shows our optimized models require just 0.36-6.25% of CubeSat RAM, making on-board anomaly detection practical even on highly constrained hardware. This research demonstrates that sophisticated anomaly detection capabilities can be successfully deployed within spacecraft edge computing constraints, providing near-instantaneous detection without exceeding hardware limitations or compromising mission safety.

Krzysztof Kotowski, Christoph Haskamp, Jacek Andrzejewski et al.

Machine learning has vast potential to improve anomaly detection in satellite telemetry which is a crucial task for spacecraft operations. This potential is currently hampered by a lack of comprehensible benchmarks for multivariate time series anomaly detection, especially for the challenging case of satellite telemetry. The European Space Agency Benchmark for Anomaly Detection in Satellite Telemetry (ESA-ADB) aims to address this challenge and establish a new standard in the domain. It is a result of close cooperation between spacecraft operations engineers from the European Space Agency (ESA) and machine learning experts. The newly introduced ESA Anomalies Dataset contains annotated real-life telemetry from three different ESA missions, out of which two are included in ESA-ADB. Results of typical anomaly detection algorithms assessed in our novel hierarchical evaluation pipeline show that new approaches are necessary to address operators' needs. All elements of ESA-ADB are publicly available to ensure its full reproducibility.

Daniel Lakey, Tim Schlippe

Spacecraft operations are highly critical, demanding impeccable reliability and safety. Ensuring the optimal performance of a spacecraft requires the early detection and mitigation of anomalies, which could otherwise result in unit or mission failures. With the advent of deep learning, a surge of interest has been seen in leveraging these sophisticated algorithms for anomaly detection in space operations. This study aims to compare the efficacy of various deep learning architectures in detecting anomalies in spacecraft data. The deep learning models under investigation include Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, and Transformer-based architectures. Each of these models was trained and validated using a comprehensive dataset sourced from multiple spacecraft missions, encompassing diverse operational scenarios and anomaly types. Initial results indicate that while CNNs excel in identifying spatial patterns and may be effective for some classes of spacecraft data, LSTMs and RNNs show a marked proficiency in capturing temporal anomalies seen in time-series spacecraft telemetry. The Transformer-based architectures, given their ability to focus on both local and global contexts, have showcased promising results, especially in scenarios where anomalies are subtle and span over longer durations. Additionally, considerations such as computational efficiency, ease of deployment, and real-time processing capabilities were evaluated. While CNNs and LSTMs demonstrated a balance between accuracy and computational demands, Transformer architectures, though highly accurate, require significant computational resources. In conclusion, the choice of deep learning architecture for spacecraft anomaly detection is highly contingent on the nature of the data, the type of anomalies, and operational constraints.