Johanna Menn

Johanna Menn, Miriam Kober, Paul Brunzema et al.

Bayesian optimization (BO) is a popular and effective approach for tuning expensive, noisy experiments, but requires the formulation of an explicit objective function. Preferential BO (PBO) removes this requirement by learning from pairwise human feedback, yet existing methods struggle to efficiently optimize beyond low- and medium-dimensional problems due to their global search approaches. We address this limitation by developing a family of local PBO methods that transfer key ideas from high-dimensional BO to the preferential setting. In particular, we introduce local PBO methods which adapt trust-region and derivative-informed local search to pairwise preference feedback, where the latter exploits first- and second-order derivatives of the Laplace-approximated GP posterior. Our benchmark on GP sample paths, standard optimization benchmark functions, and policy-search tasks shows that local PBO methods are especially effective in high-dimensional and complex landscapes with steep optima. Compared with global preference-based baselines, they can substantially reduce cumulative regret, making them particularly useful for real-world preference-based optimization tasks such as policy search.

Johanna Menn, David Stenger, Sebastian Trimpe

Bayesian optimization is a popular black-box optimization method for parameter learning in control and robotics. It typically requires an objective function that reflects the user's optimization goal. However, in practical applications, this objective function is often inaccessible due to complex or unmeasurable performance metrics. Preferential Bayesian optimization (PBO) overcomes this limitation by leveraging human feedback through pairwise comparisons, eliminating the need for explicit performance quantification. When applying PBO to hardware systems, such as in quadcopter control, crashes can cause time-consuming experimental resets, wear and tear, or otherwise undesired outcomes. Standard PBO methods cannot incorporate feedback from such crashed experiments, resulting in the exploration of parameters that frequently lead to experimental crashes. We thus introduce CrashPBO, a user-friendly mechanism that enables users to both express preferences and report crashes during the optimization process. Benchmarking on synthetic functions shows that this mechanism reduces crashes by 63% and increases data efficiency. Through experiments on three robotics platforms, we demonstrate the wide applicability and transferability of CrashPBO, highlighting that it provides a flexible, user-friendly framework for parameter learning with human feedback on preferences and crashes.

Christian Fiedler, Johanna Menn, Lukas Kreisköther et al.

Optimizing an unknown function under safety constraints is a central task in robotics, biomedical engineering, and many other disciplines, and increasingly safe Bayesian Optimization (BO) is used for this. Due to the safety critical nature of these applications, it is of utmost importance that theoretical safety guarantees for these algorithms translate into the real world. In this work, we investigate three safety-related issues of the popular class of SafeOpt-type algorithms. First, these algorithms critically rely on frequentist uncertainty bounds for Gaussian Process (GP) regression, but concrete implementations typically utilize heuristics that invalidate all safety guarantees. We provide a detailed analysis of this problem and introduce Real-\b{eta}-SafeOpt, a variant of the SafeOpt algorithm that leverages recent GP bounds and thus retains all theoretical guarantees. Second, we identify assuming an upper bound on the reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) norm of the target function, a key technical assumption in SafeOpt-like algorithms, as a central obstacle to real-world usage. To overcome this challenge, we introduce the Lipschitz-only Safe Bayesian Optimization (LoSBO) algorithm, which guarantees safety without an assumption on the RKHS bound, and empirically show that this algorithm is not only safe, but also exhibits superior performance compared to the state-of-the-art on several function classes. Third, SafeOpt and derived algorithms rely on a discrete search space, making them difficult to apply to higher-dimensional problems. To widen the applicability of these algorithms, we introduce Lipschitz-only GP-UCB (LoS-GP-UCB), a variant of LoSBO applicable to moderately high-dimensional problems, while retaining safety.