Umberto Zerbinati

NA
h-index23
3papers
6citations
Novelty42%
AI Score38

3 Papers

22.7NAMay 26
Analysis and numerical analysis of the Helmholtz-Korteweg equation

Patrick E. Farrell, Tim van Beeck, Umberto Zerbinati

We analyse the nematic Helmholtz-Korteweg equation, a variant of the classical Helmholtz equation that describes time-harmonic wave propagation in calamitic fluids in the presence of nematic order. A prominent example is given by nematic liquid crystals, which can be modeled as nematic Korteweg fluids - that is, fluids whose stress tensor depends on density gradients and on a nematic director describing the orientation of the anisotropic molecules. These materials exhibit anisotropic acoustic properties that can be tuned by external electromagnetic fields, making them attractive for potential applications such as tunable acoustic resonators. We prove the existence and uniqueness of solutions to this equation in two and three dimensions for suitable (nonresonant) wave numbers and propose a convergent discretisation for its numerical solution. The discretisation of this problem is nontrivial as it demands high regularity and involves unfamiliar boundary conditions. We address these challenges by using high-order conforming finite elements and enforcing the boundary conditions with Nitsche's method. We illustrate our analysis with numerical simulations in two dimensions.

42.0NAMay 20
Achieving Material Robustness via Symmetric Stress Finite Element Discretizations

Pablo Brubeck, Charles Parker, Umberto Zerbinati

When discretizing symmetric stress tensors in variational problems arising in continuum mechanics, one has to choose how to enforce the symmetry of the stress tensor: (i) strongly by requiring the discrete tensors to be pointwise symmetric or (ii) weakly by introducing a Lagrange multiplier. For $H(\mathrm{div})$-conforming finite element discretizations of Hellinger--Reissner elasticity and velocity--stress formulations of incompressible flow, where symmetry of the Cauchy stress tensor is tied to the conservation of angular momentum, we show that this choice may substantially impact the accuracy of the numerical scheme. Through a series of benchmark problems featuring anisotropic constitutive laws inspired by fiber reinforced material, liquid crystal polymer networks, and polar fluids, we show that schemes enforcing symmetry weakly can yield arbitrarily poor stress approximations -- even for zero-stress configurations. However, schemes enforcing symmetry strongly deliver accurate stress approximations independently of the constitutive law, a property we term material robustness. We present a unifying theory that rigorously explains this behavior.

LGMar 18, 2024
PETScML: Second-order solvers for training regression problems in Scientific Machine Learning

Stefano Zampini, Umberto Zerbinati, George Turkiyyah et al.

In recent years, we have witnessed the emergence of scientific machine learning as a data-driven tool for the analysis, by means of deep-learning techniques, of data produced by computational science and engineering applications. At the core of these methods is the supervised training algorithm to learn the neural network realization, a highly non-convex optimization problem that is usually solved using stochastic gradient methods. However, distinct from deep-learning practice, scientific machine-learning training problems feature a much larger volume of smooth data and better characterizations of the empirical risk functions, which make them suited for conventional solvers for unconstrained optimization. We introduce a lightweight software framework built on top of the Portable and Extensible Toolkit for Scientific computation to bridge the gap between deep-learning software and conventional solvers for unconstrained minimization. We empirically demonstrate the superior efficacy of a trust region method based on the Gauss-Newton approximation of the Hessian in improving the generalization errors arising from regression tasks when learning surrogate models for a wide range of scientific machine-learning techniques and test cases. All the conventional second-order solvers tested, including L-BFGS and inexact Newton with line-search, compare favorably, either in terms of cost or accuracy, with the adaptive first-order methods used to validate the surrogate models.