2.6CRJul 7
Lower Bounds for PIR with Preprocessing from Blackbox CryptographyAlexander Hoover, Giuseppe Persiano, Kevin Yeo
(shortened for arXiv metadata) We study the limits of single-server private information retrieval (PIR) with preprocessing. Prior work has shown that single-server PIR with sublinear communication requires a linear number of (public-key) server operations per query [DMO00, DH24]. Recent breakthrough works, including [CHK22, ZPZS24, LMW23], circumvent these lower bounds by critically leveraging preprocessing to construct single-server PIR with sublinear query computation. Our work presents computation lower bounds for any single-server PIR with preprocessing that makes blackbox usage of {\em any} cryptography (such as random oracles and virtual blackbox obfuscation). For any client preprocessing scheme where the client stores $s$ bits about an $n$-bit database, we prove the online amortized computation must be $Ω(n/s)$ across $k = Ω(s)$ queries (even if performed in a single batch query). In more detail, we prove that they must have either $Ω(n/s)$ amortized online communication or the server must perform $Ω(n/s)$ cryptographic operations. Our lower bounds are optimal as there exist PIRs with client preprocessing matching exactly one of the above requirements while outperforming the other. Furthermore, our lower bounds also rule out the existence of doubly efficient PIR from blackbox cryptography with sublinear query computation. Our proof framework also supports $Ω(n/s)$ communication lower bounds for three mildly restricted classes of single-server PIR. We also prove lower bounds for symmetric private information retrieval (SPIR) with client preprocessing in the random oracle model and present a matching SPIR construction with client preprocessing using only OWFs during queries.
9.7CRApr 10, 2019
What Storage Access Privacy is Achievable with Small Overhead?Sarvar Patel, Giuseppe Persiano, Kevin Yeo
Oblivious RAM (ORAM) and private information retrieval (PIR) are classic cryptographic primitives used to hide the access pattern to data whose storage has been outsourced to an untrusted server. Unfortunately, both primitives require considerable overhead compared to plaintext access. For large-scale storage infrastructure with highly frequent access requests, the degradation in response time and the exorbitant increase in resource costs incurred by either ORAM or PIR prevent their usage. In an ideal scenario, a privacy-preserving storage protocols with small overhead would be implemented for these heavily trafficked storage systems to avoid negatively impacting either performance and/or costs. In this work, we study the problem of the best $\mathit{storage\ access\ privacy}$ that is achievable with only $\mathit{small\ overhead}$ over plaintext access. To answer this question, we consider $\mathit{differential\ privacy\ access}$ which is a generalization of the $\mathit{oblivious\ access}$ security notion that are considered by ORAM and PIR. Quite surprisingly, we present strong evidence that constant overhead storage schemes may only be achieved with privacy budgets of $ε= Ω(\log n)$. We present asymptotically optimal constructions for differentially private variants of both ORAM and PIR with privacy budgets $ε= Θ(\log n)$ with only $O(1)$ overhead. In addition, we consider a more complex storage primitive called key-value storage in which data is indexed by keys from a large universe (as opposed to consecutive integers in ORAM and PIR). We present a differentially private key-value storage scheme with $ε= Θ(\log n)$ and $O(\log\log n)$ overhead. This construction uses a new oblivious, two-choice hashing scheme that may be of independent interest.
4.3DSApr 9, 2019
Lower Bounds for Oblivious Near-Neighbor SearchKasper Green Larsen, Tal Malkin, Omri Weinstein et al.
We prove an $Ω(d \lg n/ (\lg\lg n)^2)$ lower bound on the dynamic cell-probe complexity of statistically $\mathit{oblivious}$ approximate-near-neighbor search ($\mathsf{ANN}$) over the $d$-dimensional Hamming cube. For the natural setting of $d = Θ(\log n)$, our result implies an $\tildeΩ(\lg^2 n)$ lower bound, which is a quadratic improvement over the highest (non-oblivious) cell-probe lower bound for $\mathsf{ANN}$. This is the first super-logarithmic $\mathit{unconditional}$ lower bound for $\mathsf{ANN}$ against general (non black-box) data structures. We also show that any oblivious $\mathit{static}$ data structure for decomposable search problems (like $\mathsf{ANN}$) can be obliviously dynamized with $O(\log n)$ overhead in update and query time, strengthening a classic result of Bentley and Saxe (Algorithmica, 1980).
2.5CRMay 19, 2017
CacheShuffle: An Oblivious Shuffle Algorithm Using CachesSarvar Patel, Giuseppe Persiano, Kevin Yeo
We consider Oblivious Shuffling and K-Oblivious Shuffling, a refinement thereof. We provide efficient algorithms for both and discuss their application to the design of Oblivious RAM. The task of K-Oblivious Shuffling is to obliviously shuffle N encrypted blocks that have been randomly allocated on the server in such a way that an adversary learns nothing about the new allocation of blocks. The security guarantee should hold also with respect to an adversary that has learned the initial position of K touched blocks out of the N blocks. The classical notion of Oblivious Shuffling is obtained for K = N. We present a family of algorithms for Oblivious Shuffling. Our first construction, CacheShuffleRoot, is tailored for clients with $O(\sqrt{N})$ blocks of memory and uses $(4+ε)N$ blocks of bandwidth, for every $ε> 0$. CacheShuffleRoot is a 4.5x improvement over previous best known results on practical sizes of N. We also present CacheShuffle that obliviously shuffles using O(S) blocks of client memory with $O(N\log_S N)$ blocks of bandwidth. We then turn to K-Oblivious Shuffling and give algorithms that require 2N + f(K) blocks of bandwidth, for some function f. That is, any extra bandwidth above the 2N lower bound depends solely on K. We present KCacheShuffleBasic that uses O(K) client storage and exactly 2N blocks of bandwidth. For smaller client storage requirements, we show KCacheShuffle, which uses O(S) client storage and requires $2N+(1+ε)O(K\log_S K)$ blocks of bandwidth. Finally, we consider the case in which, in addition to the N blocks, the server stores D dummy blocks whose content is is irrelevant but still their positions must be hidden by the shuffling. For this case, we design algorithm KCacheShuffleDummy that, for N + D blocks and K touched blocks, uses O(K) client storage and $D+(2+ε)N$ blocks of bandwidth.