Junfeng Yang

Chengzhi Mao, Scott Geng, Junfeng Yang et al. · uw

Pretrained large-scale vision-language models like CLIP have exhibited strong generalization over unseen tasks. Yet imperceptible adversarial perturbations can significantly reduce CLIP's performance on new tasks. In this work, we identify and explore the problem of \emph{adapting large-scale models for zero-shot adversarial robustness}. We first identify two key factors during model adaption -- training losses and adaptation methods -- that affect the model's zero-shot adversarial robustness. We then propose a text-guided contrastive adversarial training loss, which aligns the text embeddings and the adversarial visual features with contrastive learning on a small set of training data. We apply this training loss to two adaption methods, model finetuning and visual prompt tuning. We find that visual prompt tuning is more effective in the absence of texts, while finetuning wins in the existence of text guidance. Overall, our approach significantly improves the zero-shot adversarial robustness over CLIP, seeing an average improvement of over 31 points over ImageNet and 15 zero-shot datasets. We hope this work can shed light on understanding the zero-shot adversarial robustness of large-scale models.

Chengzhi Mao, Kevin Xia, James Wang et al.

Visual representations underlie object recognition tasks, but they often contain both robust and non-robust features. Our main observation is that image classifiers may perform poorly on out-of-distribution samples because spurious correlations between non-robust features and labels can be changed in a new environment. By analyzing procedures for out-of-distribution generalization with a causal graph, we show that standard classifiers fail because the association between images and labels is not transportable across settings. However, we then show that the causal effect, which severs all sources of confounding, remains invariant across domains. This motivates us to develop an algorithm to estimate the causal effect for image classification, which is transportable (i.e., invariant) across source and target environments. Without observing additional variables, we show that we can derive an estimand for the causal effect under empirical assumptions using representations in deep models as proxies. Theoretical analysis, empirical results, and visualizations show that our approach captures causal invariances and improves overall generalization.

Chengzhi Mao, Revant Teotia, Amrutha Sundar et al.

Many visual recognition models are evaluated only on their classification accuracy, a metric for which they obtain strong performance. In this paper, we investigate whether computer vision models can also provide correct rationales for their predictions. We propose a ``doubly right'' object recognition benchmark, where the metric requires the model to simultaneously produce both the right labels as well as the right rationales. We find that state-of-the-art visual models, such as CLIP, often provide incorrect rationales for their categorical predictions. However, by transferring the rationales from language models into visual representations through a tailored dataset, we show that we can learn a ``why prompt,'' which adapts large visual representations to produce correct rationales. Visualizations and empirical experiments show that our prompts significantly improve performance on doubly right object recognition, in addition to zero-shot transfer to unseen tasks and datasets.

Haozhe Chen, Junfeng Yang, Carl Vondrick et al.

Large-scale pre-trained vision foundation models, such as CLIP, have become de facto backbones for various vision tasks. However, due to their black-box nature, understanding the underlying rules behind these models' predictions and controlling model behaviors have remained open challenges. We present a framework for interpreting vision transformer's latent tokens with natural language. Given a latent token, our framework retains its semantic information to the final layer using transformer's local operations and retrieves the closest text for explanation. Our approach enables understanding of model visual reasoning procedure without needing additional model training or data collection. Based on the obtained interpretations, our framework allows for model editing that controls model reasoning behaviors and improves model robustness against biases and spurious correlations.

Pierre Tholoniat, Kelly Kostopoulou, Mosharaf Chowdhury et al.

Machine learning (ML) models can leak information about users, and differential privacy (DP) provides a rigorous way to bound that leakage under a given budget. This DP budget can be regarded as a new type of compute resource in workloads of multiple ML models training on user data. Once it is used, the DP budget is forever consumed. Therefore, it is crucial to allocate it most efficiently to train as many models as possible. This paper presents the scheduler for privacy that optimizes for efficiency. We formulate privacy scheduling as a new type of multidimensional knapsack problem, called privacy knapsack, which maximizes DP budget efficiency. We show that privacy knapsack is NP-hard, hence practical algorithms are necessarily approximate. We develop an approximation algorithm for privacy knapsack, DPack, and evaluate it on microbenchmarks and on a new, synthetic private-ML workload we developed from the Alibaba ML cluster trace. We show that DPack: (1) often approaches the efficiency-optimal schedule, (2) consistently schedules more tasks compared to a state-of-the-art privacy scheduling algorithm that focused on fairness (1.3-1.7x in Alibaba, 1.0-2.6x in microbenchmarks), but (3) sacrifices some level of fairness for efficiency. Therefore, using DPack, DP ML operators should be able to train more models on the same amount of user data while offering the same privacy guarantee to their users.

Wei Hao, Aahil Awatramani, Jiayang Hu et al.

Full-precision deep learning models are typically too large or costly to deploy on edge devices. To accommodate to the limited hardware resources, models are adapted to the edge using various edge-adaptation techniques, such as quantization and pruning. While such techniques may have a negligible impact on top-line accuracy, the adapted models exhibit subtle differences in output compared to the original model from which they are derived. In this paper, we introduce a new evasive attack, DIVA, that exploits these differences in edge adaptation, by adding adversarial noise to input data that maximizes the output difference between the original and adapted model. Such an attack is particularly dangerous, because the malicious input will trick the adapted model running on the edge, but will be virtually undetectable by the original model, which typically serves as the authoritative model version, used for validation, debugging and retraining. We compare DIVA to a state-of-the-art attack, PGD, and show that DIVA is only 1.7-3.6% worse on attacking the adapted model but 1.9-4.2 times more likely not to be detected by the the original model under a whitebox and semi-blackbox setting, compared to PGD.

Yun-Yun Tsai, Chengzhi Mao, Junfeng Yang

Vision models are often vulnerable to out-of-distribution (OOD) samples without adapting. While visual prompts offer a lightweight method of input-space adaptation for large-scale vision models, they rely on a high-dimensional additive vector and labeled data. This leads to overfitting when adapting models in a self-supervised test-time setting without labels. We introduce convolutional visual prompts (CVP) for label-free test-time adaptation for robust visual perception. The structured nature of CVP demands fewer trainable parameters, less than 1\% compared to standard visual prompts, combating overfitting. Extensive experiments and analysis on a wide variety of OOD visual perception tasks show that our approach is effective, improving robustness by up to 5.87% over several large-scale models.

Yun-Yun Tsai, Ju-Chin Chao, Albert Wen et al.

Training-time defenses, known as adversarial training, incur high training costs and do not generalize to unseen attacks. Test-time defenses solve these issues but most existing test-time defenses require adapting the model weights, therefore they do not work on frozen models and complicate model memory management. The only test-time defense that does not adapt model weights aims to adapt the input with self-supervision tasks. However, we empirically found these self-supervision tasks are not sensitive enough to detect adversarial attacks accurately. In this paper, we propose DRAM, a novel defense method to detect and repair adversarial samples at test time via Masked autoencoder (MAE). We demonstrate how to use MAE losses to build a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to detect adversarial samples. Moreover, we use the MAE losses to calculate input reversal vectors that repair adversarial samples resulting from previously unseen attacks. Results on large-scale ImageNet dataset show that, compared to all detection baselines evaluated, DRAM achieves the best detection rate (82% on average) on all eight adversarial attacks evaluated. For attack repair, DRAM improves the robust accuracy by 6% ~ 41% for standard ResNet50 and 3% ~ 8% for robust ResNet50 compared with the baselines that use contrastive learning and rotation prediction.

Matthew Lawhon, Chengzhi Mao, Junfeng Yang

Deep networks achieve state-of-the-art performance on computer vision tasks, yet they fail under adversarial attacks that are imperceptible to humans. In this paper, we propose a novel defense that can dynamically adapt the input using the intrinsic structure from multiple self-supervised tasks. By simultaneously using many self-supervised tasks, our defense avoids over-fitting the adapted image to one specific self-supervised task and restores more intrinsic structure in the image compared to a single self-supervised task approach. Our approach further improves robustness and clean accuracy significantly compared to the state-of-the-art single task self-supervised defense. Our work is the first to connect multiple self-supervised tasks to robustness, and suggests that we can achieve better robustness with more intrinsic signal from visual data.

Chengzhi Mao, Carl Vondrick, Hao Wang et al.

We find that large language models (LLMs) are more likely to modify human-written text than AI-generated text when tasked with rewriting. This tendency arises because LLMs often perceive AI-generated text as high-quality, leading to fewer modifications. We introduce a method to detect AI-generated content by prompting LLMs to rewrite text and calculating the editing distance of the output. We dubbed our geneRative AI Detection viA Rewriting method Raidar. Raidar significantly improves the F1 detection scores of existing AI content detection models -- both academic and commercial -- across various domains, including News, creative writing, student essays, code, Yelp reviews, and arXiv papers, with gains of up to 29 points. Operating solely on word symbols without high-dimensional features, our method is compatible with black box LLMs, and is inherently robust on new content. Our results illustrate the unique imprint of machine-generated text through the lens of the machines themselves.