James Dunham

Raquib Bin Yousuf, Subhodip Biswas, Kulendra Kumar Kaushal et al.

Understanding key insights from full-text scholarly articles is essential as it enables us to determine interesting trends, give insight into the research and development, and build knowledge graphs. However, some of the interesting key insights are only available when considering full-text. Although researchers have made significant progress in information extraction from short documents, extraction of scientific entities from full-text scholarly literature remains a challenging problem. This work presents an automated End-to-end Research Entity Extractor called EneRex to extract technical facets such as dataset usage, objective task, method from full-text scholarly research articles. Additionally, we extracted three novel facets, e.g., links to source code, computing resources, programming language/libraries from full-text articles. We demonstrate how EneRex is able to extract key insights and trends from a large-scale dataset in the domain of computer science. We further test our pipeline on multiple datasets and found that the EneRex improves upon a state of the art model. We highlight how the existing datasets are limited in their capacity and how EneRex may fit into an existing knowledge graph. We also present a detailed discussion with pointers for future research. Our code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/DiscoveryAnalyticsCenter/EneRex.

Autumn Toney-Wails, Christian Schoeberl, James Dunham

Identifying scientific publications that are within a dynamic field of research often requires costly annotation by subject-matter experts. Resources like widely-accepted classification criteria or field taxonomies are unavailable for a domain like artificial intelligence (AI), which spans emerging topics and technologies. We address these challenges by inferring a functional definition of AI research from existing expert labels, and then evaluating state-of-the-art chatbot models on the task of expert data annotation. Using the arXiv publication database as ground-truth, we experiment with prompt engineering for GPT chatbot models to identify an alternative, automated expert annotation pipeline that assigns AI labels with 94% accuracy. For comparison, we fine-tune SPECTER, a transformer language model pre-trained on scientific publications, that achieves 96% accuracy (only 2% higher than GPT) on classifying AI publications. Our results indicate that with effective prompt engineering, chatbots can be used as reliable data annotators even where subject-area expertise is required. To evaluate the utility of chatbot-annotated datasets on downstream classification tasks, we train a new classifier on GPT-labeled data and compare its performance to the arXiv-trained model. The classifier trained on GPT-labeled data outperforms the arXiv-trained model by nine percentage points, achieving 82% accuracy.

James Dunham, Jennifer Melot, Dewey Murdick

We describe a strategy for identifying the universe of research publications relevant to the application and development of artificial intelligence. The approach leverages the arXiv corpus of scientific preprints, in which authors choose subject tags for their papers from a set defined by editors. We compose a functional definition of AI relevance by learning these subjects from paper metadata, and then inferring the arXiv-subject labels of papers in larger corpora: Clarivate Web of Science, Digital Science Dimensions, and Microsoft Academic Graph. This yields predictive classification $F_1$ scores between .75 and .86 for Natural Language Processing (cs.CL), Computer Vision (cs.CV), and Robotics (cs.RO). For a single model that learns these and four other AI-relevant subjects (cs.AI, cs.LG, stat.ML, and cs.MA), we see precision of .83 and recall of .85. We evaluate the out-of-domain performance of our classifiers against other sources of topic information and predictions from alternative methods. We find that a supervised solution can generalize to identify publications that belong to the high-level fields of study represented on arXiv. This offers a method for identifying AI-relevant publications that updates at the pace of research output, without reliance on subject-matter experts for query development or labeling.