Longteng Zhang

Longteng Zhang, Lin Zhang, Shaohuai Shi et al.

The low-rank adaptation (LoRA) method can largely reduce the amount of trainable parameters for fine-tuning large language models (LLMs), however, it still requires expensive activation memory to update low-rank weights. Reducing the number of LoRA layers or using activation recomputation could harm the fine-tuning performance or increase the computational overhead. In this work, we present LoRA-FA, a memory-efficient fine-tuning method that reduces the activation memory without performance degradation and expensive recomputation. LoRA-FA chooses to freeze the projection-down weight of $A$ and update the projection-up weight of $B$ in each LoRA layer. It ensures the change of model weight reside in a low-rank space during LLMs fine-tuning, while eliminating the requirement to store full-rank input activations. We conduct extensive experiments across multiple model types (RoBERTa, T5, LLaMA) and model scales. Our results show that LoRA-FA can always achieve close fine-tuning accuracy across different tasks compared to full parameter fine-tuning and LoRA. Furthermore, LoRA-FA can reduce the overall memory cost by up to 1.4$\times$ compared to LoRA.

Longteng Zhang, Xiang Liu, Zeyu Li et al.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have seen great advance in both academia and industry, and their popularity results in numerous open-source frameworks and techniques in accelerating LLM pre-training, fine-tuning, and inference. Training and deploying LLMs are expensive as it requires considerable computing resources and memory, hence many efficient approaches have been developed for improving system pipelines as well as operators. However, the runtime performance can vary significantly across hardware and software stacks, which makes it difficult to choose the best configuration. In this work, we aim to benchmark the performance from both macro and micro perspectives. First, we benchmark the end-to-end performance of pre-training, fine-tuning, and serving LLMs in different sizes , i.e., 7, 13, and 70 billion parameters (7B, 13B, and 70B) on three 8-GPU platforms with and without individual optimization techniques, including ZeRO, quantization, recomputation, FlashAttention. Then, we dive deeper to provide a detailed runtime analysis of the sub-modules, including computing and communication operators in LLMs. For end users, our benchmark and findings help better understand different optimization techniques, training and inference frameworks, together with hardware platforms in choosing configurations for deploying LLMs. For researchers, our in-depth module-wise analyses discover potential opportunities for future work to further optimize the runtime performance of LLMs.

Lin Zhang, Longteng Zhang, Shaohuai Shi et al.

To accelerate distributed training, many gradient compression methods have been proposed to alleviate the communication bottleneck in synchronous stochastic gradient descent (S-SGD), but their efficacy in real-world applications still remains unclear. In this work, we first evaluate the efficiency of three representative compression methods (quantization with Sign-SGD, sparsification with Top-k SGD, and low-rank with Power-SGD) on a 32-GPU cluster. The results show that they cannot always outperform well-optimized S-SGD or even worse due to their incompatibility with three key system optimization techniques (all-reduce, pipelining, and tensor fusion) in S-SGD. To this end, we propose a novel gradient compression method, called alternate compressed Power-SGD (ACP-SGD), which alternately compresses and communicates low-rank matrices. ACP-SGD not only significantly reduces the communication volume, but also enjoys the three system optimizations like S-SGD. Compared with Power-SGD, the optimized ACP-SGD can largely reduce the compression and communication overheads, while achieving similar model accuracy. In our experiments, ACP-SGD achieves an average of 4.06x and 1.43x speedups over S-SGD and Power-SGD, respectively, and it consistently outperforms other baselines across different setups (from 8 GPUs to 64 GPUs and from 1Gb/s Ethernet to 100Gb/s InfiniBand).