Seong-Woong Shim

Myunsoo Kim, Seongwoong Shim, Byung-Jun Lee

False negatives pose a critical challenge in vision-language pretraining (VLP) due to the many-to-many correspondence between images and texts in large-scale datasets. These false negatives introduce conflicting supervision signals that degrade the learned embedding space and diminish the effectiveness of hard negative sampling. In this paper, we propose FALCON (False-negative Aware Learning of COntrastive Negatives), a learning-based mini-batch construction strategy that adaptively balances the trade-off between hard and false negatives during VLP. Rather than relying on fixed heuristics, FALCON employs a negative mining scheduler that dynamically selects negative samples of appropriate hardness for each anchor instance during mini-batch construction, guided by a proxy for cross-modal alignment improvement. Experimental results demonstrate that FALCON significantly improves performance across three vision-language learning frameworks (ALBEF, BLIP-2, SigLIP-2) and a broad range of downstream tasks and evaluation settings, underscoring its effectiveness and robustness in mitigating the impact of false negatives.

Hee-Jun Ahn, Seong-Woong Shim, Byung-Jun Lee

In offline imitation learning (IL), we generally assume only a handful of expert trajectories and a supplementary offline dataset from suboptimal behaviors to learn the expert policy. While it is now common to minimize the divergence between state-action visitation distributions so that the agent also considers the future consequences of an action, a sampling error in an offline dataset may lead to erroneous estimates of state-action visitations in the offline case. In this paper, we investigate the effect of controlling the effective planning horizon (i.e., reducing the discount factor) as opposed to imposing an explicit regularizer, as previously studied. Unfortunately, it turns out that the existing algorithms suffer from magnified approximation errors when the effective planning horizon is shortened, which results in a significant degradation in performance. We analyze the main cause of the problem and provide the right remedies to correct the algorithm. We show that the corrected algorithm improves on popular imitation learning benchmarks by controlling the effective planning horizon rather than an explicit regularization.