Changdae Oh

Heeyoung Lee, Hoyoon Byun, Changdae Oh et al.

Accessing machine learning models through remote APIs has been gaining prevalence following the recent trend of scaling up model parameters for increased performance. Even though these models exhibit remarkable ability, detecting out-of-distribution (OOD) samples remains a crucial safety concern for end users as these samples may induce unreliable outputs from the model. In this work, we propose an OOD detection framework, MixDiff, that is applicable even when the model's parameters or its activations are not accessible to the end user. To bypass the access restriction, MixDiff applies an identical input-level perturbation to a given target sample and a similar in-distribution (ID) sample, then compares the relative difference in the model outputs of these two samples. MixDiff is model-agnostic and compatible with existing output-based OOD detection methods. We provide theoretical analysis to illustrate MixDiff's effectiveness in discerning OOD samples that induce overconfident outputs from the model and empirically demonstrate that MixDiff consistently enhances the OOD detection performance on various datasets in vision and text domains.

Changdae Oh, Zhen Fang, Shawn Im et al.

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown promising capabilities but struggle under distribution shifts, where evaluation data differ from instruction tuning distributions. Although previous works have provided empirical evaluations, we argue that establishing a formal framework that can characterize and quantify the risk of MLLMs is necessary to ensure the safe and reliable application of MLLMs in the real world. By taking an information-theoretic perspective, we propose the first theoretical framework that enables the quantification of the maximum risk of MLLMs under distribution shifts. Central to our framework is the introduction of Effective Mutual Information (EMI), a principled metric that quantifies the relevance between input queries and model responses. We derive an upper bound for the EMI difference between in-distribution (ID) and out-of-distribution (OOD) data, connecting it to visual and textual distributional discrepancies. Extensive experiments on real benchmark datasets, spanning 61 shift scenarios, empirically validate our theoretical insights.