13.5CLSep 17, 2024
Preference Tuning with Human Feedback on Language, Speech, and Vision Tasks: A SurveyGenta Indra Winata, Hanyang Zhao, Anirban Das et al.
Preference tuning is a crucial process for aligning deep generative models with human preferences. This survey offers a thorough overview of recent advancements in preference tuning and the integration of human feedback. The paper is organized into three main sections: 1) introduction and preliminaries: an introduction to reinforcement learning frameworks, preference tuning tasks, models, and datasets across various modalities: language, speech, and vision, as well as different policy approaches, 2) in-depth exploration of each preference tuning approach: a detailed analysis of the methods used in preference tuning, and 3) applications, discussion, and future directions: an exploration of the applications of preference tuning in downstream tasks, including evaluation methods for different modalities, and an outlook on future research directions. Our objective is to present the latest methodologies in preference tuning and model alignment, enhancing the understanding of this field for researchers and practitioners. We hope to encourage further engagement and innovation in this area.
4.8CLSep 19, 2024
LLM Surgery: Efficient Knowledge Unlearning and Editing in Large Language ModelsAkshaj Kumar Veldanda, Shi-Xiong Zhang, Anirban Das et al.
Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized various domains, yet their utility comes with significant challenges related to outdated or problematic knowledge embedded during pretraining. This paper addresses the challenge of modifying LLMs to unlearn problematic and outdated information while efficiently integrating new knowledge without retraining from scratch. Here, we propose LLM Surgery, a framework to efficiently modify LLM behaviour by optimizing a three component objective function that: (1) Performs reverse gradient on unlearning dataset (problematic and outdated information), (2) Performs gradient descent on the update dataset (new and updated information), and (3) Minimizes the KL divergence on the retain dataset (small subset of unchanged text), ensuring alignment between pretrained and modified model outputs. Due to the lack of publicly available datasets specifically tailored for our novel task, we compiled a new dataset and an evaluation benchmark. Using Llama2-7B, we demonstrate that LLM Surgery can achieve significant forgetting on the unlearn set, a 20\% increase in accuracy on the update set, and maintain performance on the retain set.
2.7CLNov 13, 2025
Leveraging Parameter Space Symmetries for Reasoning Skill Transfer in LLMsStefan Horoi, Sangwoo Cho, Supriyo Chakraborty et al.
Task arithmetic is a powerful technique for transferring skills between Large Language Models (LLMs), but it often suffers from negative interference when models have diverged during training. We address this limitation by first aligning the models' parameter spaces, leveraging the inherent permutation, rotation, and scaling symmetries of Transformer architectures. We adapt parameter space alignment for modern Grouped-Query Attention (GQA) and SwiGLU layers, exploring both weight-based and activation-based approaches. Using this alignment-first strategy, we successfully transfer advanced reasoning skills to a non-reasoning model. Experiments on challenging reasoning benchmarks show that our method consistently outperforms standard task arithmetic. This work provides an effective approach for merging and transferring specialized skills across evolving LLM families, reducing redundant fine-tuning and enhancing model adaptability.
9.6CLApr 9
Decomposing the Delta: What Do Models Actually Learn from Preference Pairs?Chia-Hsuan Lee, Mingyang Zhou, Renkun Ni et al.
Preference optimization methods such as DPO and KTO are widely used for aligning language models, yet little is understood about what properties of preference data drive downstream reasoning gains. We ask: what aspects of a preference pair improve a reasoning model's performance on general reasoning tasks? We investigate two distinct notions of quality delta in preference data: generator-level delta, arising from the differences in capability between models that generate chosen and rejected reasoning traces, and sample-level delta, arising from differences in judged quality differences within an individual preference pair. To study generator-level delta, we vary the generator's scale and model family, and to study sample-level delta, we employ an LLM-as-a-judge to rate the quality of generated traces along multiple reasoning-quality dimensions. We find that increasing generator-level delta steadily improves performance on out-of-domain reasoning tasks and filtering data by sample-level delta can enable more data-efficient training. Our results suggest a twofold recipe for improving reasoning performance through preference optimization: maximize generator-level delta when constructing preference pairs and exploit sample-level delta to select the most informative training examples.
13.0AIApr 12
Your Model Diversity, Not Method, Determines Reasoning StrategyMoulik Choraria, Argyrios Gerogiannis, Anirban Das et al.
Compute scaling for LLM reasoning requires allocating budget between exploring solution approaches ($breadth$) and refining promising solutions ($depth$). Most methods implicitly trade off one for the other, yet why a given trade-off works remains unclear, and validation on a single model obscures the role of the model itself. We argue that $\textbf{the optimal strategy depends on the model's diversity profile, the spread of probability mass across solution approaches, and that this must be characterized before any exploration strategy is adopted.}$ We formalize this through a theoretical framework decomposing reasoning uncertainty and derive conditions under which tree-style depth refinement outperforms parallel sampling. We validate it on Qwen-3 4B and Olmo-3 7B families, showing that lightweight signals suffice for depth-based refinement on low-diversity aligned models while yielding limited utility for high-diversity base models, which we hypothesize require stronger compensation for lower exploration coverage.
5.7CLMay 19
Critique-Guided Distillation for Robust Reasoning via RefinementBerkcan Kapusuzoglu, Supriyo Chakraborty, Zain Sarwar et al.
Supervised fine-tuning with expert demonstrations often produces models that imitate outputs without internalizing the reasoning processes needed for robust generalization. While critique-based approaches show promise, training models to generate critiques directly, such as Critique Fine-Tuning (CFT), can lead to output-format drift and degradation of general capabilities. We propose Critique-Guided Distillation (CGD), a training framework that decouples critique consumption from critique generation. During fine-tuning, the student is trained to refine flawed responses conditioned on teacher critiques. CGD treats critiques as a \textit{training-time-only} supervision signal, encouraging internalization of error-aware reasoning: critiques guide learning but are absent at inference. Controlled ablations confirm that these reasoning gains are directly driven by the specificity and relevance of the teacher's feedback. Across five model families, CGD consistently outperforms CFT and standard distillation on mathematical reasoning benchmarks, yielding 7\% average improvements and gains of up to +15.0\% on AMC23 and +12.2\% on MATH-500. On challenging competition problems such as AIME24 and AIME25, CGD achieves substantially higher Pass@1 and stronger performance at low Pass@k, indicating improved reasoning quality per sample. Importantly, CGD preserves general instruction-following capabilities where CFT degrades significantly ($-$21.3\% on IFEval). These results position CGD as a practical and compute-efficient intermediate training paradigm for reasoning-centric tasks without introducing architectural inference-time overhead.