Lui Yoshida

Lui Yoshida

This study investigates the impact of example selection on the performance of au-tomated essay scoring (AES) using few-shot prompting with GPT models. We evaluate the effects of the choice and order of examples in few-shot prompting on several versions of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 models. Our experiments involve 119 prompts with different examples, and we calculate the quadratic weighted kappa (QWK) to measure the agreement between GPT and human rater scores. Regres-sion analysis is used to quantitatively assess biases introduced by example selec-tion. The results show that the impact of example selection on QWK varies across models, with GPT-3.5 being more influenced by examples than GPT-4. We also find evidence of majority label bias, which is a tendency to favor the majority la-bel among the examples, and recency bias, which is a tendency to favor the label of the most recent example, in GPT-generated essay scores and QWK, with these biases being more pronounced in GPT-3.5. Notably, careful example selection enables GPT-3.5 models to outperform some GPT-4 models. However, among the GPT models, the June 2023 version of GPT-4, which is not the latest model, exhibits the highest stability and performance. Our findings provide insights into the importance of example selection in few-shot prompting for AES, especially in GPT-3.5 models, and highlight the need for individual performance evaluations of each model, even for minor versions.

Lui Yoshida

This study investigates the necessity and impact of a detailed rubric in automated essay scoring (AES) using large language models (LLMs). While using rubrics are standard in LLM-based AES, creating detailed rubrics requires substantial ef-fort and increases token usage. We examined how different levels of rubric detail affect scoring accuracy across multiple LLMs using the TOEFL11 dataset. Our experiments compared three conditions: a full rubric, a simplified rubric, and no rubric, using four different LLMs (Claude 3.5 Haiku, Gemini 1.5 Flash, GPT-4o-mini, and Llama 3 70B Instruct). Results showed that three out of four models maintained similar scoring accuracy with the simplified rubric compared to the detailed one, while significantly reducing token usage. However, one model (Gemini 1.5 Flash) showed decreased performance with more detailed rubrics. The findings suggest that simplified rubrics may be sufficient for most LLM-based AES applications, offering a more efficient alternative without compromis-ing scoring accuracy. However, model-specific evaluation remains crucial as per-formance patterns vary across different LLMs.

Keno Harada, Lui Yoshida, Takeshi Kojima et al.

The performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) is highly sensitive to the prompts they are given. Drawing inspiration from the field of prompt optimization, this study investigates the potential for enhancing Automated Essay Scoring (AES) by refining the scoring rubrics used by LLMs. Specifically, our approach prompts models to iteratively refine rubrics by reflecting on models' own scoring rationales and observed discrepancies with human scores on sample essays. Experiments on the TOEFL11 and ASAP datasets using GPT-4.1, Gemini-2.5-Pro, and Qwen-3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct show Quadratic Weighted Kappa (QWK) improvements of up to 0.19 and 0.47, respectively. Notably, even with a simple initial rubric, our approach achieves comparable or better QWK than using detailed human-authored rubrics. Our findings highlight the importance of iterative rubric refinement in LLM-based AES to enhance alignment with human evaluations.