Honglin Shu

Kazuki Kusama, Honglin Shu, Masanari Kondo et al.

Log statements capture critical information for software maintenance activities such as testing, debugging, and failure analysis. Because of this importance, developers must carefully design log statements, which requires significant effort. To support developers, various end-to-end automated log statement generation approaches have been proposed, whereas these approaches have mainly been evaluated within a single programming language environment and their effectiveness in multilingual environments remains underexplored. In this paper, we therefore comparatively evaluate three state-of-the-art log statement generation approaches and five large language models (LLMs) across multiple programming languages. For this purpose, we constructed a multilingual benchmark comprising 150,000 instances across five programming languages. Our empirical results demonstrate that UniLog, a state-of-the-art approach, achieves the best overall performance, maintaining high effectiveness even in multilingual environments. We also observe substantial variance in the difficulty of log generation across languages: Python presents a greater challenge, whereas JavaScript yields comparatively better performance. Detailed analysis reveals that these disparities stem from variations in log insertion distributions and language-specific logging idioms. Our findings indicate that simply scaling model size or the volume of training data is insufficient for multilingual log generation; rather, designing approaches tailored to the specific characteristics of target languages is crucial. These findings suggest that future automated logging techniques should explicitly account for language-specific logging characteristics to achieve robust performance in multilingual software development environments.

Honglin Shu, Zhao Tian, Dong Wang et al.

Mutation testing is a powerful technique for ensuring software quality. However, the presence of equivalent mutants introduces unnecessary costs and biases, limiting its practical effectiveness. Although numerous equivalent mutant detection (EMD) methods have been proposed, they often face distinct challenges: pure-code analysis methods can be limited by their reliance on specific compiler infrastructures, while existing machine-learning approaches remain constrained by scarce training data and limited generalization to unseen mutants. Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated remarkable performance across diverse code-related tasks by better capturing program semantics. Yet their potential for EMD remains largely unexplored, particularly in the multi-lingual context. This paper presents the first comprehensive empirical study on LLMs for EMD, using 3,302 Java and 1,088 C mutant pairs to benchmark against state-of-the-art methods, explore strategy variations, assess efficiency, and evaluate cross-lingual generalization. Experimental results show that LLM-based approaches achieve higher F1-scores than the evaluated traditional methods, with fine-tuned code embedding yielding the highest detection accuracy among the tested strategies. Moreover, LLM-based approaches strike a practical balance between effectiveness and efficiency with inference times comparable to existing machine-learning models. Importantly, fine-tuned LLMs demonstrate measurable generalization across programming languages. These findings establish LLMs as a viable and efficient approach for tackling the longstanding challenge of equivalent mutant detection, offering new directions for advancing mutation testing in practice.