Edouard Nemery

Michael Lampis, Valia Mitsou, Edouard Nemery et al.

In this paper we study the Spanning Tree Congestion problem, where we are given a graph $G=(V,E)$ and are asked to find a spanning tree $T$ of minimum maximum congestion. Here, the congestion of an edge $e\in T$ is the number of edges $uv\in E$ such that the (unique) path from $u$ to $v$ in $T$ traverses $e$. We consider this well-studied NP-hard problem from the point of view of (structural) parameterized complexity and obtain the following results. We resolve a natural open problem by showing that Spanning Tree Congestion is not FPT parameterized by treewidth (under standard assumptions). More strongly, we present a generic reduction which applies to (almost) any parameter of the form ``vertex-deletion distance to class $\mathcal{C}$'', thus obtaining W[1]-hardness for parameters more restricted than treewidth, including tree-depth plus feedback vertex set, or incomparable to treewidth, such as twin cover. Via a slight tweak of the same reduction we also show that the problem is NP-complete on interval graphs of modular-width $4$. Even though it is known that Spanning Tree Congestion remains NP-hard on instances with only one vertex of unbounded degree, it is currently open whether the problem remains hard on bounded-degree graphs. We resolve this question by showing NP-hardness on graphs of maximum degree 8. Complementing the problem's W[1]-hardness for treewidth...

Sotiris Kanellopoulos, Edouard Nemery, Christos Pergaminelis et al.

The concept of fair orientations in graphs was introduced by Christodoulou, Fiat, Koutsoupias, and Sgouritsa in 2023, naturally modeling fair division scenarios in which resources are only contested by neighbors. In this model, vertices represent agents and undirected edges represent goods; edges have to be oriented towards one of their endpoints, i.e., allocated to one of their adjacent agents. Although EFX orientations (envy-free up to any good) have been extensively studied in this setting, EF orientations (envy-free) remain unexplored. In this work, we initiate their study, mostly under the lens of parameterized complexity, presenting various tractable cases, hardness results, and parameterizations. Our results concern both simple graphs and multigraphs. Interestingly, many of our results transfer to EFX orientations, thus complementing and improving upon previous work; notably, we answer an open question regarding the structural parameterized complexity of the latter problem on graphs of polynomially-bounded valuations. We also show that EF orientations are tractable in cases in which EFX orientations are not, particularly for binary valuations. Lastly, we consider charity in the orientation setting, establishing algorithms for finding the minimum amount of edges that have to be removed from a graph in order for EF(X) orientations to exist.

Joanne Dumont, Edouard Nemery, Anthony Perez et al.

A broadcast on a connected graph is a function f that assigns each vertex v an integer f(v) with 0 <= f(v) <= ecc(v) where ecc(v) denotes the eccentricity of v. A vertex u hears a broadcasting vertex v (with f(v)>0) if u is at distance at most f(v) from v. Beyond the classical broadcast domination problem, where every vertex is required to hear at least one vertex, two variants raise intriguing combinatorial and algorithmic questions. In an independent broadcast, no broadcasting vertex hears another broadcasting vertex, while a broadcast packing requires that every vertex hears at most one broadcasting vertex. The corresponding problems Broadcast Independence and Broadcast Packing ask for broadcasts of values at least k under these constraints, where the value is the sum of the broadcast values. We initiate a systematic study of the parameterized complexity of such problems. We prove that Broadcast Independence and Broadcast Packing are FPT parameterized by the treewidth plus the diameter of G, with a family of dynamic-programming algorithms over nice tree decompositions. We obtain as a corollary that both problems are FPT parameterized by k and the treewidth of G and XP for treewidth only. The latter result shows that the known algorithm for trees (Bessy and Rautenbach, DAM 2022) can indeed be extended to bounded treewidth graphs. On the negative side, we show that Broadcast Independence is W[1]-hard parameterized by the pathwidth of G. Note that this result completes the picture for parameter k and treewidth for Broadcast Independence since it is known to be W[1]-hard for k only. We complement these results by showing that a weighted version of both problems, where the input comes with a weight function on the edges, is W[1]-hard parameterized by the vertex cover of G. Finally, we provide a constant-factor approximation algorithm parameterized by treewidth for Broadcast Independence.

Lapo Cioni, Sotiris Kanellopoulos, Edouard Nemery et al.

The Minimum Temporal Path Cover (TPC) and Minimum Temporally Disjoint Path Cover (TDPC) problems were introduced by [Chakraborty, Dailly, Foucaud, Klasing, MFCS '24]. Both were shown to be NP-hard on temporal DAGs, while the latter is also NP-hard on temporal oriented trees. All tractable cases for T(D)PC established in that paper satisfy a temporal Dilworth property, namely that the size of the minimum T(D)PC is equal to the size of the maximum antichain. This raises a natural question: is T(D)PC polynomial-time solvable under the promise that the respective Dilworth property holds? In this work, we answer this question in the affirmative for both problems, proving in fact that, under the respective promise, the size of the minimum T(D)PC is exactly equal to the Lovász number of the connectivity graph. In another direction, we establish parameterized algorithms and hardness results for TPC and TDPC. Our main result is that TPC is W[1]-hard parameterized by the deletion distance to linear forest even for temporal graphs with two time-steps, answering in the negative an open question by Chakraborty et al. about whether an XP algorithm parameterized by treewidth plus number of time-steps can be improved to FPT. On the other hand, we prove that an FPT algorithm does exist if the vertex cover number is used as parameter instead of the treewidth in the above parameterization. We complement this with a proof that including the number of time-steps in the parameter is necessary to yield tractability, as, otherwise, both TPC and TDPC remain NP-hard even for constant vertex cover size. Along the way, we establish various other para-NP-hardness results involving structural parameters such as the pathwidth and the maximum degree of the underlying graph.