Tianlong Fan

Wenjun Jiang, Tianlong Fan, Changhao Li et al.

Connectivity robustness, a crucial aspect for understanding, optimizing, and repairing complex networks, has traditionally been evaluated through time-consuming and often impractical simulations. Fortunately, machine learning provides a new avenue for addressing this challenge. However, several key issues remain unresolved, including the performance in more general edge removal scenarios, capturing robustness through attack curves instead of directly training for robustness, scalability of predictive tasks, and transferability of predictive capabilities. In this paper, we address these challenges by designing a convolutional neural networks (CNN) model with spatial pyramid pooling networks (SPP-net), adapting existing evaluation metrics, redesigning the attack modes, introducing appropriate filtering rules, and incorporating the value of robustness as training data. The results demonstrate the thoroughness of the proposed CNN framework in addressing the challenges of high computational time across various network types, failure component types and failure scenarios. However, the performance of the proposed CNN model varies: for evaluation tasks that are consistent with the trained network type, the proposed CNN model consistently achieves accurate evaluations of both attack curves and robustness values across all removal scenarios. When the predicted network type differs from the trained network, the CNN model still demonstrates favorable performance in the scenario of random node failure, showcasing its scalability and performance transferability. Nevertheless, the performance falls short of expectations in other removal scenarios. This observed scenario-sensitivity in the evaluation of network features has been overlooked in previous studies and necessitates further attention and optimization. Lastly, we discuss important unresolved questions and further investigation.

Chang Guo, Juyuan Zhang, Chang Su et al.

Propagation models are essential for modeling and simulating dynamic processes such as epidemics and information diffusion. However, existing tools struggle to scale to large-scale graphs that emerge across social networks, epidemic networks and so on, due to limited algorithmic efficiency, weak scalability, and high communication overhead. We present FS_GPlib, a unified library that enables efficient, high-fidelity propagation modeling on Web-scale graphs. FS_GPlib introduces a dual-acceleration framework: it combines micro-level synchronous message-passing updates with macro-level batched Monte Carlo simulation, leveraging high-dimensional tensor operations for parallel execution. To further enhance scalability, it supports distributed simulation via a novel target-node-based graph partitioning strategy that minimizes communication overhead while maintaining load balance. Theoretically, we show that under ideal assumptions, the runtime of simulations converges approximately to a constant. Extensive experiments demonstrate up to 35,000 times speedup over standard libraries such as NDlib and execution of a full Monte Carlo simulation on a Web-scale (billion-edge) graph in 11 seconds while maintaining high simulation fidelity. FS_GPlib supports 29 propagation models-including epidemic and opinion dynamics and dynamic network models-and offers a lightweight Python API compatible with mainstream data science ecosystems. By addressing the unique challenges of modeling diffusion and cascades on the Web, FS_GPlib provides a scalable, extensible, and theoretically grounded solution for large-scale propagation analysis in epidemiology, social media analysis, and online network dynamics. Code available at: https://github.com/Allen-Ciel/FS_GPlib.

Wenjun Jiang, Peiyan Li, Tianlong Fan et al.

Robustness is pivotal for comprehending, designing, optimizing, and rehabilitating networks, with simulation attacks being the prevailing evaluation method. Simulation attacks are often time-consuming or even impractical, however, a more crucial yet persistently overlooked drawback is that any attack strategy merely provides a potential paradigm of disintegration. The key concern is: in the worst-case scenario or facing the most severe attacks, what is the limit of robustness, referred to as ``Worst Robustness'', for a given system? Understanding a system's worst robustness is imperative for grasping its reliability limits, accurately evaluating protective capabilities, and determining associated design and security maintenance costs. To address these challenges, we introduce the concept of Most Destruction Attack (MDA) based on the idea of knowledge stacking. MDA is employed to assess the worst robustness of networks, followed by the application of an adapted CNN algorithm for rapid worst robustness prediction. We establish the logical validity of MDA and highlight the exceptional performance of the adapted CNN algorithm in predicting the worst robustness across diverse network topologies, encompassing both model and empirical networks.