Sirwan A. Aula

Dana A Abdullah, Dana Rasul Hamad, Bishar Rasheed Ibrahim et al.

Altered fingerprint recognition (AFR) is challenging for biometric verification in applications such as border control, forensics, and fiscal admission. Adversaries can deliberately modify ridge patterns to evade detection, so robust recognition of altered prints is essential. We present DeepAFRNet, a deep learning recognition model that matches and recognizes distorted fingerprint samples. The approach uses a VGG16 backbone to extract high-dimensional features and cosine similarity to compare embeddings. We evaluate on the SOCOFing Real-Altered subset with three difficulty levels (Easy, Medium, Hard). With strict thresholds, DeepAFRNet achieves accuracies of 96.7 percent, 98.76 percent, and 99.54 percent for the three levels. A threshold-sensitivity study shows that relaxing the threshold from 0.92 to 0.72 sharply degrades accuracy to 7.86 percent, 27.05 percent, and 29.51 percent, underscoring the importance of threshold selection in biometric systems. By using real altered samples and reporting per-level metrics, DeepAFRNet addresses limitations of prior work based on synthetic alterations or limited verification protocols, and indicates readiness for real-world deployments where both security and recognition resilience are critical.

Sirwan A. Aula, Tarik A. Rashid

Optimization techniques are pivotal in neural network training, shaping both predictive performance and convergence efficiency. This study introduces Foxtsage, a novel hybrid optimisation approach that integrates the Hybrid FOX-TSA with Stochastic Gradient Descent for training Multi-Layer Perceptron models. The proposed Foxtsage method is benchmarked against the widely adopted Adam optimizer across multiple standard datasets, focusing on key performance metrics such as training loss, accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and computational time. Experimental results demonstrate that Foxtsage achieves a 42.03% reduction in loss mean (Foxtsage: 9.508, Adam: 16.402) and a 42.19% improvement in loss standard deviation (Foxtsage: 20.86, Adam: 36.085), reflecting enhanced consistency and robustness. Modest improvements in accuracy mean (0.78%), precision mean (0.91%), recall mean (1.02%), and F1-score mean (0.89%) further underscore its predictive performance. However, these gains are accompanied by an increased computational cost, with a 330.87% rise in time mean (Foxtsage: 39.541 seconds, Adam: 9.177 seconds). By effectively combining the global search capabilities of FOX-TSA with the stability and adaptability of SGD, Foxtsage presents itself as a robust and viable alternative for neural network optimization tasks.