Oliver Hennhöfer

Shamira Venturini, Oliver Hennhöfer, Steffen Kinkel et al.

Fine-grained morphosyntactic error annotation is important in clinical and developmental language research, yet it is labour-intensive, expert-dependent, and difficult to scale. We present TalkTag, an LLM-based lightweight tool fine-tuned to automate CHAT-style error annotation in spoken-language transcripts. Developed under conditions of extreme data scarcity using children's narrative data, the system shows the feasibility of linguistic analysis in low-resource settings. Our evaluation demonstrates that TalkTag produces encouragingly precise annotation while effectively identifying instances where linguistic ambiguity makes automated tagging genuinely complex. In summary, with TalkTag, we provide a scalable alternative to manual error annotation and practically viable support for morphosyntactic error annotation.

Oliver Hennhöfer, Maximilian Kirsch, Christine Preisach

Most anomaly detection systems output scores rather than calibrated decisions, leaving practitioners to choose thresholds heuristically and without clear statistical interpretation. Conformal anomaly detection addresses this limitation by converting anomaly scores into calibrated p-values that are valid under the statistical assumption of data exchangeability, with a growing literature extending this idea beyond that setting. We present 'nonconform', a Python package for applying conformal anomaly detection within existing machine-learning workflows, and use it as the basis for an implementation-grounded introduction to the field. The package integrates with 'scikit-learn', 'pyod', and custom anomaly detectors, and provides a unified interface for calibration, p-value generation, and false discovery rate control. It supports several conformalization strategies, ranging from simple split-conformal calibration to more data-efficient and shift-aware extensions. Through a progression from foundational concepts to advanced conformalization strategies, complemented by code examples, the paper connects the statistical ideas behind conformal anomaly detection to their practical use in 'nonconform'. Empirical results demonstrate that the implemented methods enable statistically principled anomaly detection. Together, the package and exposition aim to make core conformal anomaly detection workflows more accessible and reproducible in experimental and production-oriented settings.

Oliver Hennhöfer, Christine Preisach

The requirement of uncertainty quantification for anomaly detection systems has become increasingly important. In this context, effectively controlling Type I error rates ($α$) without compromising the statistical power ($1-β$) of these systems can build trust and reduce costs related to false discoveries. The field of conformal anomaly detection emerges as a promising approach for providing respective statistical guarantees by model calibration. However, the dependency on calibration data poses practical limitations - especially within low-data regimes. In this work, we formally define and evaluate leave-one-out-, bootstrap-, and cross-conformal methods for anomaly detection, incrementing on methods from the field of conformal prediction. Looking beyond the classical inductive conformal anomaly detection, we demonstrate that derived methods for calculating resampling-conformal $p$-values strike a practical compromise between statistical efficiency (full-conformal) and computational efficiency (split-conformal) as they make more efficient use of available data. We validate derived methods and quantify their improvements for a range of one-class classifiers and datasets.