Alexander Lieb

Alexander Lieb, Hendrik Göttmann, Lars Luthmann et al.

Timed automata are a widely used formalism for specifying the discrete-state/continuous-time behavior of time-critical reactive systems. For the fundamental verification problem of comparing two timed automata, it has been shown that timed trace equivalence is undecidable, while timed bisimulation is decidable. The corresponding decidability proof uses region graphs, a finite but space-consuming characterization of timed automata semantics. Most verification tools use zone graphs instead, a symbolic and, on average, more space-efficient representation of timed automata semantics. However, zone graphs provide correct results only for those verification tasks that are reducible to reachability problems, and are too imprecise for timed bisimilarity checking. To the best of our knowledge, there is currently no practical tool for automated timed bisimilarity checking. In this paper, we propose a new representation of timed automata semantics that extends zone graphs by so-called virtual clocks. Our zone-based construction is, on average, significantly smaller than the corresponding region graph representation. We also present experimental results obtained by applying our tool implementation to timed automata models, which are often used to evaluate timed automata analysis techniques.

Alexander Lieb, Malte Lochau

Timed automata provide a modeling formalism for time-critical properties of reactive systems with discrete-state/continuous-time behaviors. To handle the infinite state space of timed automata, recent verification tools use zone graphs, a symbolic semantic model that guarantees sound results, at least for properties reducible to reachability problems. If we instead want to compare the behavior of two timed automata, checking for timed trace equivalence is undecidable. Fortunately, timed bisimulation equivalence is decidable, but currently available checks do not provide useful explanations of the results. To overcome this limitation, we use a recently proposed extension of zone graphs by so-called virtual clocks. The extension not only facilitates effective tool support for timed bisimilarity checking but also enables the derivation of useful explanations from the results. If timed bisimilarity holds, all witnesses derivable from the composed symbolic representation of both models are indeed valid for both models. If timed bisimilarity does not hold, we describe how to obtain counterexamples, making explicit the behavioral differences. These witnesses/counterexamples may serve as test cases in later stages of system refinement.