Bolin Zhu

Bolin Zhu, Xiaoze Liu, Xin Mao et al.

The objective of Entity Alignment (EA) is to identify equivalent entity pairs from multiple Knowledge Graphs (KGs) and create a more comprehensive and unified KG. The majority of EA methods have primarily focused on the structural modality of KGs, lacking exploration of multi-modal information. A few multi-modal EA methods have made good attempts in this field. Still, they have two shortcomings: (1) inconsistent and inefficient modality modeling that designs complex and distinct models for each modality; (2) ineffective modality fusion due to the heterogeneous nature of modalities in EA. To tackle these challenges, we propose PathFusion, consisting of two main components: (1) MSP, a unified modeling approach that simplifies the alignment process by constructing paths connecting entities and modality nodes to represent multiple modalities; (2) IRF, an iterative fusion method that effectively combines information from different modalities using the path as an information carrier. Experimental results on real-world datasets demonstrate the superiority of PathFusion over state-of-the-art methods, with 22.4%-28.9% absolute improvement on Hits@1, and 0.194-0.245 absolute improvement on MRR.

Xiao Li, Bolin Zhu, Kaiwen Shi et al.

The application of formulas (e.g., physics formulas) is a fundamental human ability in solving numerical reasoning problems. Existing numerical reasoning datasets rarely explicitly state the formulas employed, as their questions often rely on implicit commonsense mathematical knowledge. To address this gap, we introduce FormulaReasoning, a new dataset specifically designed for formula-based numerical reasoning. It consists of 5,324 questions that require numerical calculations grounded in external physics formulas. We provide normalized, fine-grained annotations in both English and Chinese, including formula structures, parameter names, symbols, numerical values, and units-curated through extensive manual effort with LLM-assisted validation to ensure high quality. Additionally, we offer a consolidated formula database to serve as an external knowledge source. We analyze various reasoning approaches on FormulaReasoning, with emphasis on comparative evaluation of different architectural and methodological frameworks. Our assessment includes retrieval-augmented methods, approaches that decompose reasoning into formula generation, parameter extraction, and numerical calculation, as well as optimization techniques using preference data. We identify key challenges in formula-based numerical reasoning that require further investigation across different reasoning paradigms, highlighting opportunities for methodological advancement.

Yicheng Zou, Bolin Zhu, Xingwu Hu et al.

With the rapid increase in the volume of dialogue data from daily life, there is a growing demand for dialogue summarization. Unfortunately, training a large summarization model is generally infeasible due to the inadequacy of dialogue data with annotated summaries. Most existing works for low-resource dialogue summarization directly pretrain models in other domains, e.g., the news domain, but they generally neglect the huge difference between dialogues and conventional articles. To bridge the gap between out-of-domain pretraining and in-domain fine-tuning, in this work, we propose a multi-source pretraining paradigm to better leverage the external summary data. Specifically, we exploit large-scale in-domain non-summary data to separately pretrain the dialogue encoder and the summary decoder. The combined encoder-decoder model is then pretrained on the out-of-domain summary data using adversarial critics, aiming to facilitate domain-agnostic summarization. The experimental results on two public datasets show that with only limited training data, our approach achieves competitive performance and generalizes well in different dialogue scenarios.

Tao Gui, Xiao Wang, Qi Zhang et al.

Various robustness evaluation methodologies from different perspectives have been proposed for different natural language processing (NLP) tasks. These methods have often focused on either universal or task-specific generalization capabilities. In this work, we propose a multilingual robustness evaluation platform for NLP tasks (TextFlint) that incorporates universal text transformation, task-specific transformation, adversarial attack, subpopulation, and their combinations to provide comprehensive robustness analysis. TextFlint enables practitioners to automatically evaluate their models from all aspects or to customize their evaluations as desired with just a few lines of code. To guarantee user acceptability, all the text transformations are linguistically based, and we provide a human evaluation for each one. TextFlint generates complete analytical reports as well as targeted augmented data to address the shortcomings of the model's robustness. To validate TextFlint's utility, we performed large-scale empirical evaluations (over 67,000 evaluations) on state-of-the-art deep learning models, classic supervised methods, and real-world systems. Almost all models showed significant performance degradation, including a decline of more than 50% of BERT's prediction accuracy on tasks such as aspect-level sentiment classification, named entity recognition, and natural language inference. Therefore, we call for the robustness to be included in the model evaluation, so as to promote the healthy development of NLP technology.