Alexandra Brintrup

h-index1
2papers
1citation

2 Papers

11.3AIMay 26
Helicase: Uncertainty-Guided Supply Chain Knowledge Graph Construction with Autonomous Multi-Agent LLMs

Yunbo Long, Haolang Zhao, Ge Zheng et al.

LLM-based multi-agent systems have been widely adopted for knowledge retrieval and report generation, synthesizing known information through web search and textual reasoning. However, many critical information tasks in supply chains are not simple one-shot queries: they are structural inference problems requiring multi-hop reasoning across complex, fragmented web resources. Questions such as \textit{``Which Tesla components use lithium from Australian mines?''} have no answer in any single document; answers must be computationally synthesized through the autonomous construction and analysis of dynamic knowledge graphs assembled from fragmented, heterogeneous sources. Moreover, such discovery processes must be uncertainty-aware: decisions depend not only on answers but on calibrated confidence in their reliability, traceable to source quality and reasoning consistency. To address this capability gap, we propose \textit{Helicase}, an autonomous multi-agent LLM system for uncertainty-guided supply chain knowledge graph construction. \textit{Helicase} decomposes high-level supply-chain queries into executable investigation plans, coordinates specialized web-search, reasoning, and coding agents through iterative verification loops, and incrementally constructs query-specific supply chain knowledge graphs with per-fact uncertainty annotations. Its three-layer uncertainty framework tracks uncertainty at the action, trajectory, and memory layers, enabling both structural inference and calibrated confidence assessment. To evaluate autonomous reasoning across the full complexity spectrum, we introduce SCQA (Supply Chain Query Assessment), a benchmark of 80 supply chain queries organized into four quadrants spanning single-hop to multi-hop inference under both high and low data visibility.

13.0LGFeb 6, 2025
Evaluating Inter-Column Logical Relationships in Synthetic Tabular Data Generation

Yunbo Long, Liming Xu, Alexandra Brintrup

Current evaluations of synthetic tabular data mainly focus on how well joint distributions are modeled, often overlooking the assessment of their effectiveness in preserving realistic event sequences and coherent entity relationships across columns.This paper proposes three evaluation metrics designed to assess the preservation of logical relationships among columns in synthetic tabular data. We validate these metrics by assessing the performance of both classical and state-of-the-art generation methods on a real-world industrial dataset.Experimental results reveal that existing methods often fail to rigorously maintain logical consistency (e.g., hierarchical relationships in geography or organization) and dependencies (e.g., temporal sequences or mathematical relationships), which are crucial for preserving the fine-grained realism of real-world tabular data. Building on these insights, this study also discusses possible pathways to better capture logical relationships while modeling the distribution of synthetic tabular data.