Ofir Kruzel

Ofir Kruzel, Itzik Klien

Deep learning models dependency on large-scale inertial datasets presents a significant bottleneck in inertial sensor-based classification tasks, such as human activity recognition and smartphone location recognition. In these domains, data collection requires massive recording campaigns that are complex, time-consuming, and difficult to scale. Currently, data-driven guidelines for determining the minimum sample size required to reach a desired accuracy level do not exist. To address this gap, this study presents a systematic empirical evaluation of learning curve convergence rates in inertial classification. We introduce a unified framework that analyzes classification performance under both binary and multi-class scenarios, and derive an empirical formula to estimate performance relative to dataset size. Testing across six diverse, real-world datasets totaling 102.7 hours of inertial measurements demonstrates that accuracy follows a consistent logarithmic growth pattern, regardless of task complexity. Leveraging this finding, we propose a quantitative stability point metric, defined as the sample size required for the learning curve to stabilize within a predefined mean absolute percentage deviation of its asymptotic maximum. Our analysis reveals that models often reach practical stability with substantially fewer samples than traditional heuristics suggest. Ultimately, we offer a generalizable framework to extrapolate total data requirements from small-scale pilot studies, optimizing the tradeoff between recording effort and model reliability. These findings shift the prevailing paradigm from maximizing data volume toward optimizing data efficiency, offering concrete, data-backed guidelines for planning recording campaigns in inertial sensing applications.

Zeev Yampolsky, Ofir Kruzel, Victoria Khalfin Fekson et al.

Inertial sensors are crucial for recognizing pedestrian activity. Recent advances in deep learning have greatly improved inertial sensing performance and robustness. Different domains and platforms use deep-learning techniques to enhance network performance, but there is no common benchmark. The latter is crucial for fair comparison and evaluation within a standardized framework. The aim of this paper is to fill this gap by defining and analyzing ten data-driven techniques for improving neural inertial classification networks. In order to accomplish this, we focused on three aspects of neural networks: network architecture, data augmentation, and data preprocessing. The experiments were conducted across four datasets collected from 78 participants. In total, over 936 minutes of inertial data sampled between 50-200Hz were analyzed. Data augmentation through rotation and multi-head architecture consistently yields the most significant improvements. Additionally, this study outlines benchmarking strategies for enhancing neural inertial classification networks.