Golzar Atefi

Justus Westerhoff, Golzar Atefi, Mario Koddenbrock et al.

The capacity of a foundation model allows for adaptation to new downstream tasks. Weight imprinting is a universal and efficient method to fulfill this purpose. It has been reinvented several times, but it has not been systematically studied. In this paper, we propose a framework for imprinting, identifying three main components: generation, normalization, and aggregation. This allows us to conduct an in-depth analysis of imprinting and a comparison of the existing work. We reveal the benefits of representing novel data with multiple proxies in the generation step and show the importance of proper normalization. We determine proxies through clustering and propose a novel variant of imprinting that outperforms previous work. We motivate this by the neural collapse phenomenon -- an important connection that we can draw for the first time. Our results show an increase of up to 4\% in challenging scenarios with complex data distributions for new classes. Finally, we publicly release our code at https://github.com/DATEXIS/multi-imprinting/.

Maggie Mi, Golzar Atefi, Atsuki Yamaguchi et al.

Idioms can be analysed in terms of their decomposability, the extent to which constituent meanings contribute to the figurative whole. Decomposability is thought to predict syntactic flexibility. Usage-based accounts instead attribute idiom behaviour to distributional experience, such as speaker familiarity and predictability. We examine these views using contextualised language models as controlled distributional learners. We propose a model-internal measure of decomposability and relate it to human ratings, syntactic flexibility, and predictability while tracking idiom learning during pretraining. Model-derived decomposability correlates weakly with human judgments and shows a small but consistent negative relationship with syntactic flexibility. Pretraining analyses show that stabilisation of idiom representations in models is not explained by frequency alone. Instead, surprisal, decomposability, and frequency all contribute, with decomposability showing the strongest training-dependent effect.