Kaoutar El Maghraoui

Alimurtaza Mustafa Merchant, Krish Veera, Sajal Kumar Goyla et al.

Industrial asset operations workflows are latency-sensitive because a single user query may require coordination over sensor data, work orders, failure modes, forecasting tools, and domain-specific agents. We evaluate this problem on AssetOpsBench (AOB), an industrial agent benchmark whose plan-execute pipeline exposes repeated overhead from tool discovery, LLM planning, MCP tool execution, and final summarization. Existing LLM caching techniques such as KV-cache reuse and embedding-based semantic caching were designed for chatbot serving and break down when output validity depends on time, asset, or sensor parameters. We propose two complementary optimization layers for AOB plan-execute pipelines: a temporal semantic cache and a set of MCP workflow optimizations combining disk-backed tool-discovery caching and dependency-aware parallel step execution. MCP workflow optimizations corresponded to a 1.67x speedup and reduced median end-to-end latency by about 40.0% while the temporal-cache benchmark achieved a median of 30.6x speedup on cache hits. Beyond the speedup, our results expose a concrete failure mode of pure semantic caching for parameter-rich industrial queries, providing a critical analysis of how caching choices interact with evaluation correctness in MCP-backed agent benchmarks.

Dhaval C. Patel, Kaoutar El Maghraoui, Shuxin Lin et al.

Agent benchmarks are growing fast, but no single benchmark touches more than four or five of the dimensions that deployment exposes. This paper aggregates the largest coordinated deep-dive of one MCP-based industrial-agent benchmark to date: fourteen parallel implementation studies covering new asset classes (including a multi-modal visual extension), alternative orchestrations, retrieval strategies, reasoning modes, infrastructure optimizations, and evaluation-methodology probes. Consolidating those studies with seven prior agent benchmarks, we argue that aggregate-score leaderboards systematically underspecify deployed-agent evaluation. Rankings derived from aggregate scores do not transfer to out-of-distribution settings; recent public-to-hidden competition retrospectives provide direct empirical evidence of this rank instability. We propose ranking configurations by predictive validity, the correlation between in-sample and out-of-sample rank, rather than in-sample mean, and report a twelve-tier measurement apparatus that exposes the deployment-relevant dimensions HELM and its agent-era successors collapse. The position is operationalized through three falsifiable out-of-distribution criteria with explicit thresholds; existing evidence partly supports it but is too thin to confirm. We close with a pre-registered pilot design and a field-level vision for what the next generation of agentic benchmarks should report.

Sagar Chethan Kumar, Rohith Kanathur, Dhaval Patel et al.

Industrial agent benchmarks require realistic evaluation scenarios that integrate telemetry, failure modes, maintenance records, and domain standards. However, existing benchmarks such as AssetOpsBench rely on manually authored scenarios and cover a limited set of asset classes. We extend AssetOpsBench with a Smart Grid Transformer asset class and four IEC-grounded diagnostic tools for health-index prediction, dissolved-gas analysis, winding-temperature assessment, and load-profile assessment. We further introduce ScenarioGeneratorAgent, a pipeline for synthetic industrial-agent scenario generation. The pipeline constructs evidence-grounded asset profiles, allocates coverage-aware scenario budgets across operational domains, and generates candidates through a hybrid validation-and-repair loop that enforces schema validity, tool reachability, physical plausibility, standards alignment, and deduplication. To improve scalability, we apply two-level caching, parallel focus-group generation, thread-pool offloading, batched LLM calls, and early rejection filtering. On Smart Grid Transformer scenario generation, these optimizations reduce end-to-end runtime by $8\times$ for 50 scenarios while preserving quality, achieving a composite quality score of $74.2 \pm 1.9$ compared with $73.8 \pm 3.0$ for the unoptimized baseline. These results show that standards-grounded synthetic scenario generation can efficiently expand industrial-agent benchmarks without sacrificing scenario quality.

Ismail Erbas, Ferhat Demirkiran, Karthik Swaminathan et al.

Fluorescence LiDAR (FLiDAR), a Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) technology employed for distance and depth estimation across medical, automotive, and other fields, encounters significant computational challenges in scattering media. The complex nature of the acquired FLiDAR signal, particularly in such environments, makes isolating photon time-of-flight (related to target depth) and intrinsic fluorescence lifetime exceptionally difficult, thus limiting the effectiveness of current analytical and computational methodologies. To overcome this limitation, we present a Physics-Guided Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) framework tailored for specialized modeling of diverse temporal components. In contrast to the conventional MoE approaches our expert models are informed by underlying physics, such as the radiative transport equation governing photon propagation in scattering media. Central to our approach is EvidenceMoE, which integrates Evidence-Based Dirichlet Critics (EDCs). These critic models assess the reliability of each expert's output by providing per-expert quality scores and corrective feedback. A Decider Network then leverages this information to fuse expert predictions into a robust final estimate adaptively. We validate our method using realistically simulated Fluorescence LiDAR (FLiDAR) data for non-invasive cancer cell depth detection generated from photon transport models in tissue. Our framework demonstrates strong performance, achieving a normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE) of 0.030 for depth estimation and 0.074 for fluorescence lifetime.