GTJun 2, 2016
Efficient Advert AssignmentFrank Kelly, Peter Key, Neil Walton
We develop a framework for the analysis of large-scale Ad-auctions where adverts are assigned over a continuum of search types. For this pay-per-click market, we provide an efficient mechanism that maximizes social welfare. In particular, we show that the social welfare optimization can be solved in separate optimizations conducted on the time-scales relevant to the search platform and advertisers. Here, on each search occurrence, the platform solves an assignment problem and, on a slower time-scale, each advertiser submits a bid which matches its demand for click-throughs with supply. Importantly, knowledge of global parameters, such as the distribution of search terms, is not required when separating the problem in this way. Exploiting the information asymmetry between the platform and advertiser, we describe a simple mechanism which incentivizes truthful bidding and has a unique Nash equilibrium that is socially optimal, and thus implements our decomposition. Further, we consider models where advertisers adapt their bids smoothly over time, and prove convergence to the solution that maximizes social welfare. Finally, we describe several extensions which illustrate the flexibility and tractability of our framework.
MLAug 15, 2022
Exponential Concentration in Stochastic ApproximationKody Law, Neil Walton, Shangda Yang
We analyze the behavior of stochastic approximation algorithms where iterates, in expectation, progress towards an objective at each step. When progress is proportional to the step size of the algorithm, we prove exponential concentration bounds. These tail-bounds contrast asymptotic normality results, which are more frequently associated with stochastic approximation. The methods that we develop rely on a geometric ergodicity proof. This extends a result on Markov chains due to Hajek (1982) to the area of stochastic approximation algorithms. We apply our results to several different Stochastic Approximation algorithms, specifically Projected Stochastic Gradient Descent, Kiefer-Wolfowitz and Stochastic Frank-Wolfe algorithms. When applicable, our results prove faster $O(1/t)$ and linear convergence rates for Projected Stochastic Gradient Descent with a non-vanishing gradient.
MLFeb 3, 2024Code
Accelerating Look-ahead in Bayesian Optimization: Multilevel Monte Carlo is All you NeedShangda Yang, Vitaly Zankin, Maximilian Balandat et al.
We leverage multilevel Monte Carlo (MLMC) to improve the performance of multi-step look-ahead Bayesian optimization (BO) methods that involve nested expectations and maximizations. Often these expectations must be computed by Monte Carlo (MC). The complexity rate of naive MC degrades for nested operations, whereas MLMC is capable of achieving the canonical MC convergence rate for this type of problem, independently of dimension and without any smoothness assumptions. Our theoretical study focuses on the approximation improvements for twoand three-step look-ahead acquisition functions, but, as we discuss, the approach is generalizable in various ways, including beyond the context of BO. Our findings are verified numerically and the benefits of MLMC for BO are illustrated on several benchmark examples. Code is available at https://github.com/Shangda-Yang/MLMCBO .
LGMay 18, 2021
Learning and Information in Stochastic Networks and QueuesNeil Walton, Kuang Xu
We review the role of information and learning in the stability and optimization of queueing systems. In recent years, techniques from supervised learning, bandit learning and reinforcement learning have been applied to queueing systems supported by increasing role of information in decision making. We present observations and new results that help rationalize the application of these areas to queueing systems. We prove that the MaxWeight and BackPressure policies are an application of Blackwell's Approachability Theorem. This connects queueing theoretic results with adversarial learning. We then discuss the requirements of statistical learning for service parameter estimation. As an example, we show how queue size regret can be bounded when applying a perceptron algorithm to classify service. Next, we discuss the role of state information in improved decision making. Here we contrast the roles of epistemic information (information on uncertain parameters) and aleatoric information (information on an uncertain state). Finally we review recent advances in the theory of reinforcement learning and queueing, as well as, provide discussion on current research challenges.
LGApr 21, 2021
Reinforcement Learning for Traffic Signal Control: Comparison with Commercial SystemsAlvaro Cabrejas-Egea, Raymond Zhang, Neil Walton
Recently, Intelligent Transportation Systems are leveraging the power of increased sensory coverage and computing power to deliver data-intensive solutions achieving higher levels of performance than traditional systems. Within Traffic Signal Control (TSC), this has allowed the emergence of Machine Learning (ML) based systems. Among this group, Reinforcement Learning (RL) approaches have performed particularly well. Given the lack of industry standards in ML for TSC, literature exploring RL often lacks comparison against commercially available systems and straightforward formulations of how the agents operate. Here we attempt to bridge that gap. We propose three different architectures for TSC RL agents and compare them against the currently used commercial systems MOVA, SurTrac and Cyclic controllers and provide pseudo-code for them. The agents use variations of Deep Q-Learning and Actor Critic, using states and rewards based on queue lengths. Their performance is compared in across different map scenarios with variable demand, assessing them in terms of the global delay and average queue length. We find that the RL-based systems can significantly and consistently achieve lower delays when compared with existing commercial systems.
LGOct 24, 2020
An Adiabatic Theorem for Policy Tracking with TD-learningNeil Walton
We evaluate the ability of temporal difference learning to track the reward function of a policy as it changes over time. Our results apply a new adiabatic theorem that bounds the mixing time of time-inhomogeneous Markov chains. We derive finite-time bounds for tabular temporal difference learning and $Q$-learning when the policy used for training changes in time. To achieve this, we develop bounds for stochastic approximation under asynchronous adiabatic updates.
MLAug 18, 2020
Fast Approximate Bayesian Contextual Cold Start Learning (FAB-COST)Jack R. McKenzie, Peter A. Appleby, Thomas House et al.
Cold-start is a notoriously difficult problem which can occur in recommendation systems, and arises when there is insufficient information to draw inferences for users or items. To address this challenge, a contextual bandit algorithm -- the Fast Approximate Bayesian Contextual Cold Start Learning algorithm (FAB-COST) -- is proposed, which is designed to provide improved accuracy compared to the traditionally used Laplace approximation in the logistic contextual bandit, while controlling both algorithmic complexity and computational cost. To this end, FAB-COST uses a combination of two moment projection variational methods: Expectation Propagation (EP), which performs well at the cold start, but becomes slow as the amount of data increases; and Assumed Density Filtering (ADF), which has slower growth of computational cost with data size but requires more data to obtain an acceptable level of accuracy. By switching from EP to ADF when the dataset becomes large, it is able to exploit their complementary strengths. The empirical justification for FAB-COST is presented, and systematically compared to other approaches on simulated data. In a benchmark against the Laplace approximation on real data consisting of over $670,000$ impressions from autotrader.co.uk, FAB-COST demonstrates at one point increase of over $16\%$ in user clicks. On the basis of these results, it is argued that FAB-COST is likely to be an attractive approach to cold-start recommendation systems in a variety of contexts.
LGJul 20, 2020
A Short Note on Soft-max and Policy Gradients in Bandits ProblemsNeil Walton
This is a short communication on a Lyapunov function argument for softmax in bandit problems. There are a number of excellent papers coming out using differential equations for policy gradient algorithms in reinforcement learning \cite{agarwal2019optimality,bhandari2019global,mei2020global}. We give a short argument that gives a regret bound for the soft-max ordinary differential equation for bandit problems. We derive a similar result for a different policy gradient algorithm, again for bandit problems. For this second algorithm, it is possible to prove regret bounds in the stochastic case \cite{DW20}. At the end, we summarize some ideas and issues on deriving stochastic regret bounds for policy gradients.
LGJul 20, 2020
Regret Analysis of a Markov Policy Gradient Algorithm for Multi-arm BanditsDenis Denisov, Neil Walton
We consider a policy gradient algorithm applied to a finite-arm bandit problem with Bernoulli rewards. We allow learning rates to depend on the current state of the algorithm, rather than use a deterministic time-decreasing learning rate. The state of the algorithm forms a Markov chain on the probability simplex. We apply Foster-Lyapunov techniques to analyse the stability of this Markov chain. We prove that if learning rates are well chosen then the policy gradient algorithm is a transient Markov chain and the state of the chain converges on the optimal arm with logarithmic or poly-logarithmic regret.
EMJul 2, 2019
Adaptive Pricing in Insurance: Generalized Linear Models and Gaussian Process Regression ApproachesYuqing Zhang, Neil Walton
We study the application of dynamic pricing to insurance. We view this as an online revenue management problem where the insurance company looks to set prices to optimize the long-run revenue from selling a new insurance product. We develop two pricing models: an adaptive Generalized Linear Model (GLM) and an adaptive Gaussian Process (GP) regression model. Both balance between exploration, where we choose prices in order to learn the distribution of demands & claims for the insurance product, and exploitation, where we myopically choose the best price from the information gathered so far. The performance of the pricing policies is measured in terms of regret: the expected revenue loss caused by not using the optimal price. As is commonplace in insurance, we model demand and claims by GLMs. In our adaptive GLM design, we use the maximum quasi-likelihood estimation (MQLE) to estimate the unknown parameters. We show that, if prices are chosen with suitably decreasing variability, the MQLE parameters eventually exist and converge to the correct values, which in turn implies that the sequence of chosen prices will also converge to the optimal price. In the adaptive GP regression model, we sample demand and claims from Gaussian Processes and then choose selling prices by the upper confidence bound rule. We also analyze these GLM and GP pricing algorithms with delayed claims. Although similar results exist in other domains, this is among the first works to consider dynamic pricing problems in the field of insurance. We also believe this is the first work to consider Gaussian Process regression in the context of insurance pricing. These initial findings suggest that online machine learning algorithms could be a fruitful area of future investigation and application in insurance.