Yu-Ching Shih

Nelvin Tan, Yaowen Zhang, James Asikin Cheung et al.

Large language models (LLMs) are becoming useful in many domains due to their impressive abilities that arise from large training datasets and large model sizes. However, research on LLM-based approaches to document inconsistency detection is relatively limited. We address this gap by investigating evidence extraction capabilties of LLMs for document inconsistency detection. To this end, we introduce new comprehensive evidence-extraction metrics and a redact-and-retry framework with constrained filtering that substantially improves evidence extraction performance over other prompting methods. We support our approach with strong experimental results and release a new semi-synthetic dataset for evaluating evidence extraction.

Nelvin Tan, James Asikin Cheung, Yu-Ching Shih et al.

Large language models (LLMs) are becoming useful in many domains due to their impressive abilities that arise from large training datasets and large model sizes. More recently, they have been shown to be very effective in textual classification tasks, motivating the need to explain the LLMs' decisions. Motivated by practical constrains where LLMs are black-boxed and LLM calls are expensive, we study how incorporating counterfactuals into LLM reasoning can affect the LLM's ability to identify the top words that have contributed to its classification decision. To this end, we introduce a framework called the decision changing rate that helps us quantify the importance of the top words in classification. Our experimental results show that using counterfactuals can be helpful.

Nelvin Tan, Yu-Ching Shih, Dong Yang et al.

Machine learning models are being increasingly used to automate decisions in almost every domain, and ensuring the performance of these models is crucial for ensuring high quality machine learning enabled services. Ensuring concept drift is detected early is thus of the highest importance. A lot of research on concept drift has focused on the supervised case that assumes the true labels of supervised tasks are available immediately after making predictions. Controlling for false positives while monitoring the performance of predictive models used to make inference from extremely large datasets periodically, where the true labels are not instantly available, becomes extremely challenging. We propose a flexible and efficient concept drift detection algorithm that uses classical statistical process control in a label-less setting to accurately detect concept drifts. We show empirically that under computational constraints, our approach has better statistical power than previous known methods. Furthermore, we introduce a new semi-supervised drift detection framework to model the scenario of detecting drift (without labels) given prior detections, and show how our drift detection algorithm can be incorporated effectively into this framework. We demonstrate promising performance via numerical simulations.