Inbar Seroussi

2papers

2 Papers

12.3MLMay 22, 2025
Better Rates for Private Linear Regression in the Proportional Regime via Aggressive Clipping

Simone Bombari, Inbar Seroussi, Marco Mondelli

Differentially private (DP) linear regression has received significant attention in the recent theoretical literature, with several works aimed at obtaining improved error rates. A common approach is to set the clipping constant much larger than the expected norm of the per-sample gradients. While simplifying the analysis, this is however in sharp contrast with what empirical evidence suggests to optimize performance. Our work bridges this gap between theory and practice: we provide sharper rates for DP stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) by crucially operating in a regime where clipping happens frequently. Specifically, we consider the setting where the data is multivariate Gaussian, the number of training samples $n$ is proportional to the input dimension $d$, and the algorithm guarantees constant-order zero concentrated DP. Our method relies on establishing a deterministic equivalent for the trajectory of DP-SGD in terms of a family of ordinary differential equations (ODEs). As a consequence, the risk of DP-SGD is bounded between two ODEs, with upper and lower bounds matching for isotropic data. By studying these ODEs when $n / d$ is large enough, we demonstrate the optimality of aggressive clipping, and we uncover the benefits of decaying learning rate and private noise scheduling.

6.0LGMay 21
When Stronger Triggers Backfire: A High-Dimensional Theory of Backdoor Attacks

Donald Flynn, Hadas Yaron Goldhirsh, Jonathan P. Keating et al.

Backdoor poisoning attacks behave counter-intuitively in high dimensions: stronger training triggers can help the defender. We study regularised generalised linear models on Gaussian-mixture data in the proportional regime ($p/n \to κ$), varying the training trigger strength $α$ against a fixed test trigger. Three phenomena emerge: (i) clean test accuracy increases with $α$; (ii) attack success peaks at a finite $α$ and then declines; and (iii) the most damaging trigger direction is the minimum eigenvector of the data covariance. We prove all three results in closed form for the squared loss, and extend (i) and (ii) to general convex GLM losses via a Gaussian-proxy fixed-point system. We identify a finite-sample noise floor proportional to $κ$ as the mechanism behind (i), invisible to classical $n \gg p$ analysis. Experiments on CIFAR-10 and Gaussian surrogates match the theory closely; ResNet-18 experiments show the same phenomena beyond the convex setting.