Gioliano de Oliveira Braga

Sidnei Barbieri, Ágney Lopes Roth Ferraz, Wagner Comin Sonaglio et al.

Operational evidence is not automatically scientific evidence. The most realistic Security Operations Center (SOC) data is production telemetry, yet it remains scientifically inaccessible because raw logs cannot be released; as a result, research relies on synthetic or dated datasets. We treat the boundary between private production telemetry and reusable research artifacts as the design object: a methodology that extracts, anonymizes, structures, and validates Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) data from a production financial SOC while preserving task-relevant investigative structure within a declared privacy boundary. Two consumers stress the same artifact. As training material, it fails loudly: 37 MITRE ATT&CK-mapped HIKARI challenges work only when anonymization preserves temporal order and entity consistency. As a measurement substrate, it fails quietly: across 200 SOCpilot incidents, a deterministic verifier detects non-compliant Large Language Model (LLM) actions that are absent from the human baseline. The result is a measurable privacy-utility boundary rather than a formal anonymity claim.

Gioliano de Oliveira Braga, Pedro Henrique dos Santos Rocha, Rafael Pimenta de Mattos Paixão et al.

Wi-Fi Channel State Information (CSI) has been repeatedly proposed as a biometric modality, often with reports of high accuracy and operational feasibility. However, the field lacks a consolidated understanding of its security properties, adversarial resilience, and methodological consistency. This Systematization of Knowledge (SoK) examines CSI-based biometric authentication through a security perspective, analyzing how existing work differs across sensing infrastructure, signal representations, feature pipelines, learning models, and evaluation methodologies. Our synthesis reveals systemic inconsistencies: reliance on aggregate accuracy metrics, limited reporting of FAR/FRR/EER, absence of per-user risk analysis, and scarce consideration of threat models or adversarial feasibility. We construct a unified evaluation framework to empirically expose these issues and demonstrate how security-relevant metrics, such as per-class EER, FCS, and the Gini Coefficient, uncover risk concentration that remains hidden under traditional reporting practices. Our analysis highlights concrete attack surfaces and shows how methodological choices materially influence vulnerability profiles, which include replay, geometric mimicry, and environmental perturbation. Based on these findings, we articulate the security boundaries of current CSI biometrics and provide guidelines for rigorous evaluation, reproducible experimentation, and future research directions. This SoK offers the security community a structured, evidence-driven reassessment of Wi-Fi CSI biometrics and their suitability as an authentication primitive.