Nathan Lepora

LG
h-index7
3papers
35citations
Novelty47%
AI Score23

3 Papers

NCAug 23, 2022
What deep reinforcement learning tells us about human motor learning and vice-versa

Michele Garibbo, Casimir Ludwig, Nathan Lepora et al.

Machine learning and specifically reinforcement learning (RL) has been extremely successful in helping us to understand neural decision making processes. However, RL's role in understanding other neural processes especially motor learning is much less well explored. To explore this connection, we investigated how recent deep RL methods correspond to the dominant motor learning framework in neuroscience, error-based learning. Error-based learning can be probed using a mirror reversal adaptation paradigm, where it produces distinctive qualitative predictions that are observed in humans. We therefore tested three major families of modern deep RL algorithm on a mirror reversal perturbation. Surprisingly, all of the algorithms failed to mimic human behaviour and indeed displayed qualitatively different behaviour from that predicted by error-based learning. To fill this gap, we introduce a novel deep RL algorithm: model-based deterministic policy gradients (MB-DPG). MB-DPG draws inspiration from error-based learning by explicitly relying on the observed outcome of actions. We show MB-DPG captures (human) error-based learning under mirror-reversal and rotational perturbation. Next, we demonstrate error-based learning in the form of MB-DPG learns faster than canonical model-free algorithms on complex arm-based reaching tasks, while being more robust to (forward) model misspecification than model-based RL. These findings highlight the gap between current deep RL methods and human motor adaptation and offer a route to closing this gap, facilitating future beneficial interaction between between the two fields.

ROFeb 1, 2024
BrainSLAM: SLAM on Neural Population Activity Data

Kipp Freud, Nathan Lepora, Matt W. Jones et al.

Simultaneous localisation and mapping (SLAM) algorithms are commonly used in robotic systems for learning maps of novel environments. Brains also appear to learn maps, but the mechanisms are not known and it is unclear how to infer these maps from neural activity data. We present BrainSLAM; a method for performing SLAM using only population activity (local field potential, LFP) data simultaneously recorded from three brain regions in rats: hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, and parietal cortex. This system uses a convolutional neural network (CNN) to decode velocity and familiarity information from wavelet scalograms of neural local field potential data recorded from rats as they navigate a 2D maze. The CNN's output drives a RatSLAM-inspired architecture, powering an attractor network which performs path integration plus a separate system which performs `loop closure' (detecting previously visited locations and correcting map aliasing errors). Together, these three components can construct faithful representations of the environment while simultaneously tracking the animal's location. This is the first demonstration of inference of a spatial map from brain recordings. Our findings expand SLAM to a new modality, enabling a new method of mapping environments and facilitating a better understanding of the role of cognitive maps in navigation and decision making.

LGSep 21, 2021
Learning offline: memory replay in biological and artificial reinforcement learning

Emma L. Roscow, Raymond Chua, Rui Ponte Costa et al.

Learning to act in an environment to maximise rewards is among the brain's key functions. This process has often been conceptualised within the framework of reinforcement learning, which has also gained prominence in machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) as a way to optimise decision-making. A common aspect of both biological and machine reinforcement learning is the reactivation of previously experienced episodes, referred to as replay. Replay is important for memory consolidation in biological neural networks, and is key to stabilising learning in deep neural networks. Here, we review recent developments concerning the functional roles of replay in the fields of neuroscience and AI. Complementary progress suggests how replay might support learning processes, including generalisation and continual learning, affording opportunities to transfer knowledge across the two fields to advance the understanding of biological and artificial learning and memory.