Yunna Cai

Yiqiang Cai, Chengyan Wu, Bolei Ma et al.

Multimodal emotion recognition in conversations (MERC) requires integrating multimodal signals while being robust to noise and modeling contextual reasoning. Existing approaches often emphasize fusion but overlook uncertainty in noisy features and fine-grained reasoning. We propose SURE (Synergistic Uncertainty-aware REasoning) for MERC, a framework that improves robustness and contextual modeling. SURE consists of three components: an Uncertainty-Aware Mixture-of-Experts module to handle modality-specific noise, an Iterative Reasoning module for multi-turn reasoning over context, and a Transformer Gate module to capture intra- and inter-modal interactions. Experiments on benchmark MERC datasets show that SURE consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, demonstrating its effectiveness in robust multimodal reasoning. These results highlight the importance of uncertainty modeling and iterative reasoning in advancing emotion recognition in conversational settings.

Yunna Cai, Fan Wang, Haowei Wang et al.

Evaluating the safety alignment of LLM responses in high-risk mental health dialogues is particularly difficult due to missing gold-standard answers and the ethically sensitive nature of these interactions. To address this challenge, we propose PsyCrisis-Bench, a reference-free evaluation benchmark based on real-world Chinese mental health dialogues. It evaluates whether the model responses align with the safety principles defined by experts. Specifically designed for settings without standard references, our method adopts a prompt-based LLM-as-Judge approach that conducts in-context evaluation using expert-defined reasoning chains grounded in psychological intervention principles. We employ binary point-wise scoring across multiple safety dimensions to enhance the explainability and traceability of the evaluation. Additionally, we present a manually curated, high-quality Chinese-language dataset covering self-harm, suicidal ideation, and existential distress, derived from real-world online discourse. Experiments on 3600 judgments show that our method achieves the highest agreement with expert assessments and produces more interpretable evaluation rationales compared to existing approaches. Our dataset and evaluation tool are publicly available to facilitate further research.