Federico Di Gennaro

Federico Di Gennaro, Saptarshi Chakraborty, Nikita Zhivotovskiy

This paper studies the Exponential Weights (EW) algorithm with an isotropic Gaussian prior for online logistic regression. We show that the near-optimal worst-case regret bound $O(d\log(Bn))$ for EW, established by Kakade and Ng (2005) against the best linear predictor of norm at most $B$, can be achieved with total worst-case computational complexity $O(B^3 n^5)$. This substantially improves on the $O(B^{18}n^{37})$ complexity of prior work achieving the same guarantee (Foster et al., 2018). Beyond efficiency, we analyze the large-$B$ regime under linear separability: after rescaling by $B$, the EW posterior converges as $B\to\infty$ to a standard Gaussian truncated to the version cone. Accordingly, the predictor converges to a solid-angle vote over separating directions and, on every fixed-margin slice of this cone, the mode of the corresponding truncated Gaussian is aligned with the hard-margin SVM direction. Using this geometry, we derive non-asymptotic regret bounds showing that once $B$ exceeds a margin-dependent threshold, the regret becomes independent of $B$ and grows only logarithmically with the inverse margin. Overall, our results show that EW can be both computationally tractable and geometrically adaptive in online classification.

Tobias Wegel, Federico Di Gennaro, Geelon So et al.

When a learner faces a new task with few samples, it must leverage any available side information. In practice, this often comes in the form of model evaluations on related tasks in public benchmarks. A key question then is how to model task relatedness such that it is both realistic and the benchmark evaluations lead to provable gains. Empirically, we observe that weak monotonicity is often approximately satisfied: if a model dominates another on many benchmarks, it also tends to outperform on the new task. We explore the statistical complexity of learning under (approximate) weak monotonicity, leveraging it within two learning paradigms: transfer learning and model selection aggregation. We show that not only can we prune the model class based on monotonicity, but we can also further adapt to the geometry of the available trade-offs by hedging on the frontier.

Federico Di Gennaro, Khaled Eldowa, Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi

In contrast to the classic formulation of partial monitoring, linear partial monitoring can model infinite outcome spaces, while imposing a linear structure on both the losses and the observations. This setting can be viewed as a generalization of linear bandits where loss and feedback are decoupled in a flexible manner. In this work, we address a nonstochastic (adversarial), finite-actions version of the problem through a simple instance of the exploration-by-optimization method that is amenable to efficient implementation. We derive regret bounds that depend on the game structure in a more transparent manner than previous theoretical guarantees for this paradigm. Our bounds feature instance-specific quantities that reflect the degree of alignment between observations and losses, and resemble known guarantees in the stochastic setting. Notably, they achieve the standard $\sqrt{T}$ rate in easy (locally observable) games and $T^{2/3}$ in hard (globally observable) games, where $T$ is the time horizon. We instantiate these bounds in a selection of old and new partial information settings subsumed by this model, and illustrate that the achieved dependence on the game structure can be tight in interesting cases.