Daniel Stephens

Qinan Zhou, Daniel Stephens, Jing Sun

This experimental dataset presents both module-level and cell-level characterization data for lithium-ion battery modules composed of three parallel-connected inhomogeneous cells across a wide range of module-level state of health (M-SoH) and cell-to-cell variation (CtCV). First, 70 cells are aged to establish an inventory with cell-level state of health (C-SoH) ranging approximately from 100% to 80% (80% is considered as the end-of-life for automotive applications). From this inventory, 78 battery modules are then assembled, each exhibiting a distinct M-SoH value (from 100% to 80.98%) and a unique CtCV value (from 0% to 9.31%, defined as population standard deviation of C-SoH within each module). Module-level characterization data are collected at 25°C under 0.5C and 0.25C conditions, enabling extraction of module-level capacities and supporting diagnostic analyses such as incremental capacity analysis and differential voltage analysis. Before a module is assembled and tested, cell-level characterization tests are conducted for every individual cell within that module under 1C conditions, enabling direct quantification of CtCV and providing accurate labels for cell-level capacities and internal resistances. The dataset is organized with both raw time-series data and processed summary information such as C-SoH, M-SoH, and CtCV for all modules. With the paired module-level and cell-level characterization data, this dataset enables understanding and development of advanced degradation monitoring mechanisms for battery modules with parallel-connected cells in the presence of CtCVs.

Zongxia Li, Andrew Mao, Daniel Stephens et al.

Topic models are a popular tool for understanding text collections, but their evaluation has been a point of contention. Automated evaluation metrics such as coherence are often used, however, their validity has been questioned for neural topic models (NTMs) and can overlook a models benefits in real world applications. To this end, we conduct the first evaluation of neural, supervised and classical topic models in an interactive task based setting. We combine topic models with a classifier and test their ability to help humans conduct content analysis and document annotation. From simulated, real user and expert pilot studies, the Contextual Neural Topic Model does the best on cluster evaluation metrics and human evaluations; however, LDA is competitive with two other NTMs under our simulated experiment and user study results, contrary to what coherence scores suggest. We show that current automated metrics do not provide a complete picture of topic modeling capabilities, but the right choice of NTMs can be better than classical models on practical task.