Xavier Cadet

Chon-Fai Kam, Xavier Cadet, Miloud Bessafi et al.

Neural networks trained on modular arithmetic exhibit grokking, a delayed transition from memorisation to generalisation known to depend on model capacity: too little and the network memorises slowly or not at all, too much and it generalises almost immediately. What happens at the extreme of this spectrum, when the architecture's expressible function class collapses to a finite-dimensional algebraic variety? We study two-layer networks with a holomorphic monomial activation sigma(z)=z^k, trained on modular tasks encoded via roots of unity. Here the network output, regardless of hidden width, is confined to a (k+1)-dimensional subspace of characters of (Z_p)^2, an O(k/p^2) slice of the full function space. We give a complete algebraic characterisation of this subspace: a task is representable if and only if its discrete Fourier support lies on the diagonal u+v = k (mod p), which for linear-phase targets reduces to the arithmetic criterion m+n=k. This is not merely a constraint on eventual generalisation but on memorisation itself: because the outputs are algebraically confined, a non-representable target cannot be fit even on the training set, and we prove a positive lower bound on the training loss, independent of width. Across 585 runs the algebraic prediction matches the observed outcome with 99.8% accuracy, with no memorisation regime and no grokking; outcomes split cleanly into instant success and outright failure. This binary behaviour is the limiting case of the capacity-grokking relationship: when the expressible class shrinks to a fixed algebraic object, the question of when a network will grok dissolves into whether it can represent the target at all. A bottleneck ablation connects this extreme to standard networks, tracing a continuous path from representational failure, through memorisation without generalisation, to grokking with a shrinking gap as capacity grows.

Xavier Cadet, Edward Koh, Peter Chin

Large Language Model (LLM) agents are increasingly studied in multi-turn, multi-agent scenarios, yet most existing setups emphasize open-ended role-play rather than controlled evaluation. We introduce AsymPuzl, a minimal but expressive two-agent puzzle environment designed to isolate communication under information asymmetry. Each agent observes complementary but incomplete views of a symbolic puzzle and must exchange messages to solve it cooperatively. Using a diverse set of current-generation and open-source LLMs, we show that (i) strong models such as GPT-5 and Claude-4.0 reliably converge across puzzle sizes on the solution by sharing complete information in two turns, (ii) weaker models often ignore partner messages or over-correct their hypotheses, and (iii) feedback design is non-trivial: simple self-feedback improves success rates, while detailed joint feedback can hurt performance. These findings show that even in simple cooperative tasks, LLM communication strategies diverge and depend on the granularity of feedback signals. AsymPuzl thus provides a testbed for probing the limits of multi-turn cooperation and opens avenues for studying coordination mechanisms.

Qintong Xie, Edward Koh, Xavier Cadet et al.

Many real-world competitive systems require multiple decision-makers to act simultaneously under shared constraints, limited information, and repeated interaction, as in auctions, resource allocation, and security competition. We study multi-turn simultaneous bidding as a controlled testbed for such problems and propose DNQ, a solver-in-the-loop equilibrium supervision framework for training bidding agents. DNQ alternates between trajectory collection, critic-based payoff estimation, equilibrium computation, and policy imitation. At each visited state, a shared critic predicts either pairwise payoff matrices or an exact N-player payoff tensor, an external solver computes equilibrium strategies, and the agents are trained by minimizing the KL divergence between their masked policies and the solver-derived equilibrium targets. We focus on a scalable pairwise formulation that greatly reduces equilibrium-solving cost and training time compared with the exact formulation, while the shared critic amortizes payoff learning across agents and states. Experiments compare the pairwise and exact variants using critic loss, policy entropy, bidding resource usage, and training cost, showing that the pairwise method scales to larger numbers of agents, whereas the exact method becomes computationally impractical as the joint game grows. These results illustrate the trade-off between strategic fidelity and scalability in repeated competitive environments.

Xavier Cadet, Mateusz Nowak, Peter Chin

Machine learning methods rely on data. However, gathering suitable data can be challenging due to availability constraints, cost, or the need for domain expertise. Expanding datasets with additional sources is a common response to limited data, yet this practice does not always improve downstream performance and can sometimes lead to a loss of performance, known as negative transfer. We propose RADAR, a simple, geometrically grounded metric for estimating cross-domain transferability in foundation models. RADAR analyzes the layer-wise evolution of representations by measuring angular alignments and relative changes in distance along layer-to-layer displacement trajectories, and by comparing empirical distributions of within-domain and cross-domain dynamics. We hypothesize that domain transferability is related to the divergence between these trajectory distributions. We evaluate the metric across multiple modalities, including cross-lingual sentiment classification with text embedding models and cross-domain image classification with foundation vision models. Across several settings, RADAR provides competitive predictive performance relative to existing transferability metrics on several vision and text benchmarks, with particularly strong results when domain transitions are smooth or cleanly separated. Our ablations further suggest that the effectiveness of transferability estimation depends on the geometry of the model's internal representation space, with different modalities favoring different topological formulations.