Marco Rospocher

Marco Bombieri, Simone Paolo Ponzetto, Marco Rospocher

Modern Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently attracted much attention for their ability to simulate human behavior and generate text that reflects personas and demographic groups. While these capabilities can open up a multitude of diverse applications across fields, it is crucial to examine how such models represent various target groups since LLMs can perpetuate and amplify biases or discrimination against historically marginalized communities or, alternatively, as a result of debiasing efforts, overcorrect by portraying overly positive stereotypes. This overcompensation can idealize these groups, erasing the complexities and challenges they face in favor of unrealistic depictions. In this paper, we investigate how LLMs represent disability by simulating the perspectives of individuals with disabilities in generating social media posts. These posts are then compared with those written by real people with disabilities, focusing on emotional tone, sentiment, and representative words and themes. Our analysis reveals two key findings: (1) LLMs often idealize the experiences of people with disabilities, producing overly positive stereotypes that, despite appearing uplifting, fail to authentically capture their lived realities; and (2) a comparative analysis of posts simulating individuals with and without disabilities highlights a negative bias, where certain topics, such as career and entertainment, are disproportionately associated with nondisabled individuals. This reinforces exclusionary narratives and over-idealized portrayals of disability, misrepresenting the actual challenges faced by this community. These findings align with broader concerns and ongoing research showing that LLMs struggle to reflect the diverse realities of society, particularly the nuanced experiences of marginalized groups, and underscore the need for critical scrutiny of their representations.

Marco Bombieri, Paolo Fiorini, Simone Paolo Ponzetto et al.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across diverse natural language processing tasks, yet their ability to memorize structured knowledge remains underexplored. In this paper, we investigate the extent to which general-purpose pre-trained LLMs retain and correctly reproduce concept identifier (ID)-label associations from publicly available ontologies. We conduct a systematic evaluation across multiple ontological resources, including the Gene Ontology, Uberon, Wikidata, and ICD-10, using LLMs such as Pythia-12B, Gemini-1.5-Flash, GPT-3.5, and GPT-4. Our findings reveal that only a small fraction of ontological concepts is accurately memorized, with GPT-4 demonstrating the highest performance. To understand why certain concepts are memorized more effectively than others, we analyze the relationship between memorization accuracy and concept popularity on the Web. Our results indicate a strong correlation between the frequency of a concept's occurrence online and the likelihood of accurately retrieving its ID from the label. This suggests that LLMs primarily acquire such knowledge through indirect textual exposure rather than directly from structured ontological resources. Furthermore, we introduce new metrics to quantify prediction invariance, demonstrating that the stability of model responses across variations in prompt language and temperature settings can serve as a proxy for estimating memorization robustness.

Chiara Ghidini, Marco Rospocher, Luciano Serafini

In this paper we present a textual description, in terms of Description Logics, of the BPMN Ontology, which provides a clear semantic formalisation of the structural components of the Business Process Modelling Notation (BPMN), based on the latest stable BPMN specifications from OMG [BPMN Version 1.1 -- January 2008]. The development of the ontology was guided by the description of the complete set of BPMN Element Attributes and Types contained in Annex B of the BPMN specifications.

Stefano Borgo, Loris Bozzato, Alessio Palmero Aprosio et al.

Systems for automatic extraction of semantic information about events from large textual resources are now available: these tools are capable to generate RDF datasets about text extracted events and this knowledge can be used to reason over the recognized events. On the other hand, text based tasks for event recognition, as for example event coreference (i.e. recognizing whether two textual descriptions refer to the same event), do not take into account ontological information of the extracted events in their process. In this paper, we propose a method to derive event coreference on text extracted event data using semantic based rule reasoning. We demonstrate our method considering a limited (yet representative) set of event types: we introduce a formal analysis on their ontological properties and, on the base of this, we define a set of coreference criteria. We then implement these criteria as RDF-based reasoning rules to be applied on text extracted event data. We evaluate the effectiveness of our approach over a standard coreference benchmark dataset.

Giulio Petrucci, Chiara Ghidini, Marco Rospocher

Recently, Neural Networks have been proven extremely effective in many natural language processing tasks such as sentiment analysis, question answering, or machine translation. Aiming to exploit such advantages in the Ontology Learning process, in this technical report we present a detailed description of a Recurrent Neural Network based system to be used to pursue such goal.