Nadja Klein

LG
h-index1
4papers
8citations
Novelty44%
AI Score44

4 Papers

6.0LGMar 20
Scalable Learning of Multivariate Distributions via Coresets

Zeyu Ding, Katja Ickstadt, Nadja Klein et al.

Efficient and scalable non-parametric or semi-parametric regression analysis and density estimation are of crucial importance to the fields of statistics and machine learning. However, available methods are limited in their ability to handle large-scale data. We address this issue by developing a novel coreset construction for multivariate conditional transformation models (MCTMs) to enhance their scalability and training efficiency. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first coresets for semi-parametric distributional models. Our approach yields substantial data reduction via importance sampling. It ensures with high probability that the log-likelihood remains within multiplicative error bounds of $(1\pm\varepsilon)$ and thereby maintains statistical model accuracy. Compared to conventional full-parametric models, where coresets have been incorporated before, our semi-parametric approach exhibits enhanced adaptability, particularly in scenarios where complex distributions and non-linear relationships are present, but not fully understood. To address numerical problems associated with normalizing logarithmic terms, we follow a geometric approximation based on the convex hull of input data. This ensures feasible, stable, and accurate inference in scenarios involving large amounts of data. Numerical experiments demonstrate substantially improved computational efficiency when handling large and complex datasets, thus laying the foundation for a broad range of applications within the statistics and machine learning communities.

1.5CVFeb 5Code
Depth as Prior Knowledge for Object Detection

Moussa Kassem Sbeyti, Nadja Klein

Detecting small and distant objects remains challenging for object detectors due to scale variation, low resolution, and background clutter. Safety-critical applications require reliable detection of these objects for safe planning. Depth information can improve detection, but existing approaches require complex, model-specific architectural modifications. We provide a theoretical analysis followed by an empirical investigation of the depth-detection relationship. Together, they explain how depth causes systematic performance degradation and why depth-informed supervision mitigates it. We introduce DepthPrior, a framework that uses depth as prior knowledge rather than as a fused feature, providing comparable benefits without modifying detector architectures. DepthPrior consists of Depth-Based Loss Weighting (DLW) and Depth-Based Loss Stratification (DLS) during training, and Depth-Aware Confidence Thresholding (DCT) during inference. The only overhead is the initial cost of depth estimation. Experiments across four benchmarks (KITTI, MS COCO, VisDrone, SUN RGB-D) and two detectors (YOLOv11, EfficientDet) demonstrate the effectiveness of DepthPrior, achieving up to +9% mAP$_S$ and +7% mAR$_S$ for small objects, with inference recovery rates as high as 95:1 (true vs. false detections). DepthPrior offers these benefits without additional sensors, architectural changes, or performance costs. Code is available at https://github.com/mos-ks/DepthPrior.

6.6APMar 27
Semi-structured multi-state delinquency model for mortgage default

Victor Medina-Olivares, Wangzhen Xia, Stefan Lessmann et al.

We propose a semi-structured discrete-time multi-state model to analyse mortgage delinquency transitions. This model combines an easy-to-understand structured additive predictor, which includes linear effects and smooth functions of time and covariates, with a flexible neural network component that captures complex nonlinearities and higher-order interactions. To ensure identifiability when covariates are present in both components, we orthogonalise the unstructured part relative to the structured design. For discrete-time competing transitions, we derive exact transformations that map binary logistic models to valid competing transition probabilities, avoiding the need for continuous-time approximations. In simulations, our framework effectively recovers structured baseline and covariate effects while using the neural component to detect interaction patterns. We demonstrate the method using the Freddie Mac Single-Family Loan-Level Dataset, employing an out-of-time test design. Compared with a structured generalised additive benchmark, the semi-structured model provides modest but consistent gains in discrimination across the earliest prediction spans, while maintaining similar Brier scores. Adding macroeconomic indicators provides limited incremental benefit in this out-of-time evaluation and does not materially change the estimated borrower-, loan-, or duration-driven effects. Overall, semi-structured multi-state modelling offers a practical compromise between transparent effect estimates and flexible pattern learning, with potential applications beyond credit-transition forecasting.

13.0LGApr 9, 2025
Beware of "Explanations" of AI

David Martens, Galit Shmueli, Theodoros Evgeniou et al.

Understanding the decisions made and actions taken by increasingly complex AI system remains a key challenge. This has led to an expanding field of research in explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), highlighting the potential of explanations to enhance trust, support adoption, and meet regulatory standards. However, the question of what constitutes a "good" explanation is dependent on the goals, stakeholders, and context. At a high level, psychological insights such as the concept of mental model alignment can offer guidance, but success in practice is challenging due to social and technical factors. As a result of this ill-defined nature of the problem, explanations can be of poor quality (e.g. unfaithful, irrelevant, or incoherent), potentially leading to substantial risks. Instead of fostering trust and safety, poorly designed explanations can actually cause harm, including wrong decisions, privacy violations, manipulation, and even reduced AI adoption. Therefore, we caution stakeholders to beware of explanations of AI: while they can be vital, they are not automatically a remedy for transparency or responsible AI adoption, and their misuse or limitations can exacerbate harm. Attention to these caveats can help guide future research to improve the quality and impact of AI explanations.