Frej Larssen

Stefano Markidis, Gilbert Netzer, Luca Pennati et al.

We introduce QFT$\rightarrow$FFT, a family of HPC FFT libraries that compute the discrete Fourier transform by executing a quantum Fourier transform (QFT) circuit on classical quantum computer simulators. Input arrays are mapped directly to state amplitudes with explicit normalization/indexing, making QFT a drop-in replacement for FFT primitives. A backend-agnostic planner builds a fused-gate schedule and memory layout adapters to increase arithmetic intensity and reduce memory data movement. We implement this design on top of Google's C++ \texttt{qsim} and evaluate OpenMP, AVX, and CUDA backends. On an AMD EPYC Zen2 processor, our AVX performance is on par with that of multithreaded FFTW, utilizing 64 threads. On an NVIDIA A100, the CUDA backend achieves more than $4\times$ lower time than both AVX and FFTW on AMD EPYC Zen2 at larger sizes. We also employ an approximate QFT (AQFT) that truncates small-angle controlled rotations beyond a cutoff $k$, reducing circuit depth and runtime while preserving accuracy.

Frej Larssen, Ivy Peng, Stefano Markidis

Pulse-level simulators are the lowest-level, most widely used abstraction layer for studying how quantum hardware responds to control signals, but they can be built on Hamiltonian models with very different fidelity and cost. This raises the question: which level of physical abstraction is sufficient for a given simulation objective? We study this question for a flux-tunable two-qubit superconducting device with a fixed bus coupler by comparing three Hamiltonian descriptions of the same hardware: an effective two-level model, a three-mode Duffing model, and a circuit-based transmon model in the charge basis. Using a realistic parameter set, we evaluate these models on a common benchmark suite spanning flux-dependent spectra, extracted two-qubit interaction terms, driven single-qubit dynamics, CZ gate dynamics, leakage outside the computational subspace, and runtime. Across the tested flux range, the Duffing model follows the circuit-based reference more closely than the effective model for static spectra and reduced two-qubit quantities, while in driven benchmarks, the multilevel models reveal effects absent in the effective description. Overall, the results support a layered use of abstraction in pulse-level simulation: effective models for reduced analyses, Duffing models as a practical multilevel default, and circuit-based models for high-fidelity reference simulation or detailed leakage analysis.