In-Saeng Suh

Seongmin Kim, Vincent R. Pascuzzi, Travis S. Humble et al.

Many real-world problems are naturally formulated as higher-order optimization (HUBO) tasks involving dense, multi-variable interactions, which are challenging to solve with classical methods. Quantum optimization offers a promising route, but hardware constraints and limitations to quadratic formulations have hampered their practicality. Here, we develop a distributed quantum optimization framework (DQOF) for dense, large-scale HUBO problems. DQOF assigns quantum circuits a central role in directly capturing higher-order interactions, while high-performance computing orchestrates large-scale parallelism and coordination. A clustering strategy enables wide quantum circuits without increasing depth, allowing efficient execution on near-term quantum hardware. We demonstrate high-quality solutions for HUBOs up to 500 variables within 170 seconds, significantly outperforming conventional approaches in solution quality and scalability. Applied to optical metamaterial design, DQOF efficiently discovers high-performance structures and shows that higher-order interactions are important for practical optimization problems. These results establish DQOF as a practical and scalable computational paradigm for large-scale scientific optimization.

Prasanna Date, Dong Jun Woun, Kathleen Hamilton et al.

Adiabatic quantum computers can solve difficult optimization problems (e.g., the quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problem), and they seem well suited to train machine learning models. In this paper, we describe an adiabatic quantum approach for training support vector machines. We show that the time complexity of our quantum approach is an order of magnitude better than the classical approach. Next, we compare the test accuracy of our quantum approach against a classical approach that uses the Scikit-learn library in Python across five benchmark datasets (Iris, Wisconsin Breast Cancer (WBC), Wine, Digits, and Lambeq). We show that our quantum approach obtains accuracies on par with the classical approach. Finally, we perform a scalability study in which we compute the total training times of the quantum approach and the classical approach with increasing number of features and number of data points in the training dataset. Our scalability results show that the quantum approach obtains a 3.5--4.5 times speedup over the classical approach on datasets with many (millions of) features.