AIOct 9, 2022
Safety Verification for Neural Networks Based on Set-boundary AnalysisZhen Liang, Dejin Ren, Wanwei Liu et al.
Neural networks (NNs) are increasingly applied in safety-critical systems such as autonomous vehicles. However, they are fragile and are often ill-behaved. Consequently, their behaviors should undergo rigorous guarantees before deployment in practice. In this paper we propose a set-boundary reachability method to investigate the safety verification problem of NNs from a topological perspective. Given an NN with an input set and a safe set, the safety verification problem is to determine whether all outputs of the NN resulting from the input set fall within the safe set. In our method, the homeomorphism property of NNs is mainly exploited, which establishes a relationship mapping boundaries to boundaries. The exploitation of this property facilitates reachability computations via extracting subsets of the input set rather than the entire input set, thus controlling the wrapping effect in reachability analysis and facilitating the reduction of computation burdens for safety verification. The homeomorphism property exists in some widely used NNs such as invertible NNs. Notable representations are invertible residual networks (i-ResNets) and Neural ordinary differential equations (Neural ODEs). For these NNs, our set-boundary reachability method only needs to perform reachability analysis on the boundary of the input set. For NNs which do not feature this property with respect to the input set, we explore subsets of the input set for establishing the local homeomorphism property, and then abandon these subsets for reachability computations. Finally, some examples demonstrate the performance of the proposed method.
LGJul 29, 2023
An Automata-Theoretic Approach to Synthesizing Binarized Neural NetworksYe Tao, Wanwei Liu, Fu Song et al.
Deep neural networks, (DNNs, a.k.a. NNs), have been widely used in various tasks and have been proven to be successful. However, the accompanied expensive computing and storage costs make the deployments in resource-constrained devices a significant concern. To solve this issue, quantization has emerged as an effective way to reduce the costs of DNNs with little accuracy degradation by quantizing floating-point numbers to low-width fixed-point representations. Quantized neural networks (QNNs) have been developed, with binarized neural networks (BNNs) restricted to binary values as a special case. Another concern about neural networks is their vulnerability and lack of interpretability. Despite the active research on trustworthy of DNNs, few approaches have been proposed to QNNs. To this end, this paper presents an automata-theoretic approach to synthesizing BNNs that meet designated properties. More specifically, we define a temporal logic, called BLTL, as the specification language. We show that each BLTL formula can be transformed into an automaton on finite words. To deal with the state-explosion problem, we provide a tableau-based approach in real implementation. For the synthesis procedure, we utilize SMT solvers to detect the existence of a model (i.e., a BNN) in the construction process. Notably, synthesis provides a way to determine the hyper-parameters of the network before training.Moreover, we experimentally evaluate our approach and demonstrate its effectiveness in improving the individual fairness and local robustness of BNNs while maintaining accuracy to a great extent.
LGJun 27, 2023
Verifying Safety of Neural Networks from Topological PerspectivesZhen Liang, Dejin Ren, Bai Xue et al.
Neural networks (NNs) are increasingly applied in safety-critical systems such as autonomous vehicles. However, they are fragile and are often ill-behaved. Consequently, their behaviors should undergo rigorous guarantees before deployment in practice. In this paper, we propose a set-boundary reachability method to investigate the safety verification problem of NNs from a topological perspective. Given an NN with an input set and a safe set, the safety verification problem is to determine whether all outputs of the NN resulting from the input set fall within the safe set. In our method, the homeomorphism property and the open map property of NNs are mainly exploited, which establish rigorous guarantees between the boundaries of the input set and the boundaries of the output set. The exploitation of these two properties facilitates reachability computations via extracting subsets of the input set rather than the entire input set, thus controlling the wrapping effect in reachability analysis and facilitating the reduction of computation burdens for safety verification. The homeomorphism property exists in some widely used NNs such as invertible residual networks (i-ResNets) and Neural ordinary differential equations (Neural ODEs), and the open map is a less strict property and easier to satisfy compared with the homeomorphism property. For NNs establishing either of these properties, our set-boundary reachability method only needs to perform reachability analysis on the boundary of the input set. Moreover, for NNs that do not feature these properties with respect to the input set, we explore subsets of the input set for establishing the local homeomorphism property and then abandon these subsets for reachability computations. Finally, some examples demonstrate the performance of the proposed method.
29.0SEApr 1
Shapley-Guided Neural Repair Approach via Derivative-Free OptimizationXinyu Sun, Wanwei Liu, Haoang Chi et al.
DNNs are susceptible to defects like backdoors, adversarial attacks, and unfairness, undermining their reliability. Existing approaches mainly involve retraining, optimization, constraint-solving, or search algorithms. However, most methods rely on gradient calculations, restricting applicability to specific activation functions (e.g., ReLU), or use search algorithms with uninterpretable localization and repair. Furthermore, they often lack generalizability across multiple properties. We propose SHARPEN, integrating interpretable fault localization with a derivative-free optimization strategy. First, SHARPEN introduces a Deep SHAP-based localization strategy quantifying each layer's and neuron's marginal contribution to erroneous outputs. Specifically, a hierarchical coarse-to-fine approach reranks layers by aggregated impact, then locates faulty neurons/filters by analyzing activation divergences between property-violating and benign states. Subsequently, SHARPEN incorporates CMA-ES to repair identified neurons. CMA-ES leverages a covariance matrix to capture variable dependencies, enabling gradient-free search and coordinated adjustments across coupled neurons. By combining interpretable localization with evolutionary optimization, SHARPEN enables derivative-free repair across architectures, being less sensitive to gradient anomalies and hyperparameters. We demonstrate SHARPEN's effectiveness on three repair tasks. Balancing property repair and accuracy preservation, it outperforms baselines in backdoor removal (+10.56%), adversarial mitigation (+5.78%), and unfairness repair (+11.82%). Notably, SHARPEN handles diverse tasks, and its modular design is plug-and-play with different derivative-free optimizers, highlighting its flexibility.
LGDec 2, 2022
Credit Assignment for Trained Neural Networks Based on Koopman Operator TheoryZhen Liang, Changyuan Zhao, Wanwei Liu et al.
Credit assignment problem of neural networks refers to evaluating the credit of each network component to the final outputs. For an untrained neural network, approaches to tackling it have made great contributions to parameter update and model revolution during the training phase. This problem on trained neural networks receives rare attention, nevertheless, it plays an increasingly important role in neural network patch, specification and verification. Based on Koopman operator theory, this paper presents an alternative perspective of linear dynamics on dealing with the credit assignment problem for trained neural networks. Regarding a neural network as the composition of sub-dynamics series, we utilize step-delay embedding to capture snapshots of each component, characterizing the established mapping as exactly as possible. To circumvent the dimension-difference problem encountered during the embedding, a composition and decomposition of an auxiliary linear layer, termed minimal linear dimension alignment, is carefully designed with rigorous formal guarantee. Afterwards, each component is approximated by a Koopman operator and we derive the Jacobian matrix and its corresponding determinant, similar to backward propagation. Then, we can define a metric with algebraic interpretability for the credit assignment of each network component. Moreover, experiments conducted on typical neural networks demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
AIJan 23, 2024
UR4NNV: Neural Network Verification, Under-approximation Reachability Works!Zhen Liang, Taoran Wu, Ran Zhao et al.
Recently, formal verification of deep neural networks (DNNs) has garnered considerable attention, and over-approximation based methods have become popular due to their effectiveness and efficiency. However, these strategies face challenges in addressing the "unknown dilemma" concerning whether the exact output region or the introduced approximation error violates the property in question. To address this, this paper introduces the UR4NNV verification framework, which utilizes under-approximation reachability analysis for DNN verification for the first time. UR4NNV focuses on DNNs with Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU) activations and employs a binary tree branch-based under-approximation algorithm. In each epoch, UR4NNV under-approximates a sub-polytope of the reachable set and verifies this polytope against the given property. Through a trial-and-error approach, UR4NNV effectively falsifies DNN properties while providing confidence levels when reaching verification epoch bounds and failing falsifying properties. Experimental comparisons with existing verification methods demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of UR4NNV, significantly reducing the impact of the "unknown dilemma".
LGMay 5, 2023
Repairing Deep Neural Networks Based on Behavior ImitationZhen Liang, Taoran Wu, Changyuan Zhao et al.
The increasing use of deep neural networks (DNNs) in safety-critical systems has raised concerns about their potential for exhibiting ill-behaviors. While DNN verification and testing provide post hoc conclusions regarding unexpected behaviors, they do not prevent the erroneous behaviors from occurring. To address this issue, DNN repair/patch aims to eliminate unexpected predictions generated by defective DNNs. Two typical DNN repair paradigms are retraining and fine-tuning. However, existing methods focus on the high-level abstract interpretation or inference of state spaces, ignoring the underlying neurons' outputs. This renders patch processes computationally prohibitive and limited to piecewise linear (PWL) activation functions to great extent. To address these shortcomings, we propose a behavior-imitation based repair framework, BIRDNN, which integrates the two repair paradigms for the first time. BIRDNN corrects incorrect predictions of negative samples by imitating the closest expected behaviors of positive samples during the retraining repair procedure. For the fine-tuning repair process, BIRDNN analyzes the behavior differences of neurons on positive and negative samples to identify the most responsible neurons for the erroneous behaviors. To tackle more challenging domain-wise repair problems (DRPs), we synthesize BIRDNN with a domain behavior characterization technique to repair buggy DNNs in a probably approximated correct style. We also implement a prototype tool based on BIRDNN and evaluate it on ACAS Xu DNNs. Our experimental results show that BIRDNN can successfully repair buggy DNNs with significantly higher efficiency than state-of-the-art repair tools. Additionally, BIRDNN is highly compatible with different activation functions.
ITFeb 10, 2021
On the Properties of Kullback-Leibler Divergence Between Multivariate Gaussian DistributionsYufeng Zhang, Wanwei Liu, Zhenbang Chen et al.
Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence is one of the most important divergence measures between probability distributions. In this paper, we prove several properties of KL divergence between multivariate Gaussian distributions. First, for any two $n$-dimensional Gaussian distributions $\mathcal{N}_1$ and $\mathcal{N}_2$, we give the supremum of $KL(\mathcal{N}_1||\mathcal{N}_2)$ when $KL(\mathcal{N}_2||\mathcal{N}_1)\leq \varepsilon\ (\varepsilon>0)$. For small $\varepsilon$, we show that the supremum is $\varepsilon + 2\varepsilon^{1.5} + O(\varepsilon^2)$. This quantifies the approximate symmetry of small KL divergence between Gaussians. We also find the infimum of $KL(\mathcal{N}_1||\mathcal{N}_2)$ when $KL(\mathcal{N}_2||\mathcal{N}_1)\geq M\ (M>0)$. We give the conditions when the supremum and infimum can be attained. Second, for any three $n$-dimensional Gaussians $\mathcal{N}_1$, $\mathcal{N}_2$, and $\mathcal{N}_3$, we find an upper bound of $KL(\mathcal{N}_1||\mathcal{N}_3)$ if $KL(\mathcal{N}_1||\mathcal{N}_2)\leq \varepsilon_1$ and $KL(\mathcal{N}_2||\mathcal{N}_3)\leq \varepsilon_2$ for $\varepsilon_1,\varepsilon_2\ge 0$. For small $\varepsilon_1$ and $\varepsilon_2$, we show the upper bound is $3\varepsilon_1+3\varepsilon_2+2\sqrt{\varepsilon_1\varepsilon_2}+o(\varepsilon_1)+o(\varepsilon_2)$. This reveals that KL divergence between Gaussians follows a relaxed triangle inequality. Importantly, all the bounds in the theorems presented in this paper are independent of the dimension $n$. Finally, We discuss the applications of our theorems in explaining counterintuitive phenomenon of flow-based model, deriving deep anomaly detection algorithm, and extending one-step robustness guarantee to multiple steps in safe reinforcement learning.
AIMar 13, 2020
On Sufficient and Necessary Conditions in Bounded CTL: A Forgetting ApproachRenyan Feng, Erman Acar, Stefan Schlobach et al.
Computation Tree Logic (CTL) is one of the central formalisms in formal verification. As a specification language, it is used to express a property that the system at hand is expected to satisfy. From both the verification and the system design points of view, some information content of such property might become irrelevant for the system due to various reasons, e.g., it might become obsolete by time, or perhaps infeasible due to practical difficulties. Then, the problem arises on how to subtract such piece of information without altering the relevant system behaviour or violating the existing specifications over a given signature. Moreover, in such a scenario, two crucial notions are informative: the strongest necessary condition (SNC) and the weakest sufficient condition (WSC) of a given property. To address such a scenario in a principled way, we introduce a forgetting-based approach in CTL and show that it can be used to compute SNC and WSC of a property under a given model and over a given signature. We study its theoretical properties and also show that our notion of forgetting satisfies existing essential postulates of knowledge forgetting. Furthermore, we analyse the computational complexity of some basic reasoning tasks for the fragment CTL_AF in particular.
LGFeb 9, 2020
Kullback-Leibler Divergence-Based Out-of-Distribution Detection with Flow-Based Generative ModelsYufeng Zhang, Jialu Pan, Wanwei Liu et al.
Recent research has revealed that deep generative models including flow-based models and Variational Autoencoders may assign higher likelihoods to out-of-distribution (OOD) data than in-distribution (ID) data. However, we cannot sample OOD data from the model. This counterintuitive phenomenon has not been satisfactorily explained and brings obstacles to OOD detection with flow-based models. In this paper, we prove theorems to investigate the Kullback-Leibler divergence in flow-based model and give two explanations for the above phenomenon. Based on our theoretical analysis, we propose a new method \PADmethod\ to leverage KL divergence and local pixel dependence of representations to perform anomaly detection. Experimental results on prevalent benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of our method. For group anomaly detection, our method achieves 98.1\% AUROC on average with a small batch size of 5. On the contrary, the baseline typicality test-based method only achieves 64.6\% AUROC on average due to its failure on challenging problems. Our method also outperforms the state-of-the-art method by 9.1\% AUROC. For point-wise anomaly detection, our method achieves 90.7\% AUROC on average and outperforms the baseline by 5.2\% AUROC. Besides, our method has the least notable failures and is the most robust one.