Evan Strasnick

CV
3papers
70citations
Novelty43%
AI Score22

3 Papers

CVJan 20, 2024
Boosting Gesture Recognition with an Automatic Gesture Annotation Framework

Junxiao Shen, Xuhai Xu, Ran Tan et al.

Training a real-time gesture recognition model heavily relies on annotated data. However, manual data annotation is costly and demands substantial human effort. In order to address this challenge, we propose a framework that can automatically annotate gesture classes and identify their temporal ranges. Our framework consists of two key components: (1) a novel annotation model that leverages the Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) loss, and (2) a semi-supervised learning pipeline that enables the model to improve its performance by training on its own predictions, known as pseudo labels. These high-quality pseudo labels can also be used to enhance the accuracy of other downstream gesture recognition models. To evaluate our framework, we conducted experiments using two publicly available gesture datasets. Our ablation study demonstrates that our annotation model design surpasses the baseline in terms of both gesture classification accuracy (3-4% improvement) and localization accuracy (71-75% improvement). Additionally, we illustrate that the pseudo-labeled dataset produced from the proposed framework significantly boosts the accuracy of a pre-trained downstream gesture recognition model by 11-18%. We believe that this annotation framework has immense potential to improve the training of downstream gesture recognition models using unlabeled datasets.

CVJan 20, 2024
Towards Open-World Gesture Recognition

Junxiao Shen, Matthias De Lange, Xuhai "Orson" Xu et al.

Providing users with accurate gestural interfaces, such as gesture recognition based on wrist-worn devices, is a key challenge in mixed reality. However, static machine learning processes in gesture recognition assume that training and test data come from the same underlying distribution. Unfortunately, in real-world applications involving gesture recognition, such as gesture recognition based on wrist-worn devices, the data distribution may change over time. We formulate this problem of adapting recognition models to new tasks, where new data patterns emerge, as open-world gesture recognition (OWGR). We propose the use of continual learning to enable machine learning models to be adaptive to new tasks without degrading performance on previously learned tasks. However, the process of exploring parameters for questions around when, and how, to train and deploy recognition models requires resource-intensive user studies may be impractical. To address this challenge, we propose a design engineering approach that enables offline analysis on a collected large-scale dataset by systematically examining various parameters and comparing different continual learning methods. Finally, we provide design guidelines to enhance the development of an open-world wrist-worn gesture recognition process.

HCFeb 13, 2022
Comparing the Perceived Legitimacy of Content Moderation Processes: Contractors, Algorithms, Expert Panels, and Digital Juries

Christina A. Pan, Sahil Yakhmi, Tara P. Iyer et al.

While research continues to investigate and improve the accuracy, fairness, and normative appropriateness of content moderation processes on large social media platforms, even the best process cannot be effective if users reject its authority as illegitimate. We present a survey experiment comparing the perceived institutional legitimacy of four popular content moderation processes. We conducted a within-subjects experiment in which we showed US Facebook users moderation decisions and randomized the description of whether those decisions were made by paid contractors, algorithms, expert panels, or juries of users. Prior work suggests that juries will have the highest perceived legitimacy due to the benefits of judicial independence and democratic representation. However, expert panels had greater perceived legitimacy than algorithms or juries. Moreover, outcome alignment - agreement with the decision - played a larger role than process in determining perceived legitimacy. These results suggest benefits to incorporating expert oversight in content moderation and underscore that any process will face legitimacy challenges derived from disagreement about outcomes.