Noemie Elhadad

Georgianna "Blue" Lin, Rencong Jiang, Noémie Elhadad et al.

Although artificial intelligence (AI) agents are increasingly proposed to support potentially longitudinal health tasks, such as symptom management, behavior change, and patient support, most current implementations fall short of facilitating user intent and fostering accountability. This contrasts with prior work on supporting longitudinal needs, where follow-up, coherent reasoning, and sustained alignment with individuals' goals are critical for both effectiveness and safety. In this paper, we draw on established clinical and personal health informatics frameworks to define what it would mean to orchestrate longitudinal health interactions with AI agents. We propose a multi-layer framework and corresponding agent architecture that operationalizes adaptation, coherence, continuity, and agency across repeated interactions. Through representative use cases, we demonstrate how longitudinal agents can maintain meaningful engagement, adapt to evolving goals, and support safe, personalized decision-making over time. Our findings underscore both the promise and the complexity of designing systems capable of supporting health trajectories beyond isolated interactions, and we offer guidance for future research and development in multi-session, user-centered health AI.

Aparajita Kashyap, Sara Matijevic, Noémie Elhadad et al.

When training machine learning (ML) models for potential deployment in a healthcare setting, it is essential to ensure that they do not replicate or exacerbate existing healthcare biases. Although many definitions of fairness exist, we focus on path-specific causal fairness, which allows us to better consider the social and medical contexts in which biases occur (e.g., direct discrimination by a clinician or model versus bias due to differential access to the healthcare system) and to characterize how these biases may appear in learned models. In this work, we map the structural fairness model to the observational healthcare setting and create a generalizable pipeline for training causally fair models. The pipeline explicitly considers specific healthcare context and disparities to define a target "fair" model. Our work fills two major gaps: first, we expand on characterizations of the "fairness-accuracy" tradeoff by detangling direct and indirect sources of bias and jointly presenting these fairness considerations alongside considerations of accuracy in the context of broadly known biases. Second, we demonstrate how a foundation model trained without fairness constraints on observational health data can be leveraged to generate causally fair downstream predictions in tasks with known social and medical disparities. This work presents a model-agnostic pipeline for training causally fair machine learning models that address both direct and indirect forms of healthcare bias.