Miklos Santha

Jonathan Allcock, Joao F. Doriguello, Gábor Ivanyos et al.

Bell sampling is a simple yet powerful tool based on measuring two copies of a quantum state in the Bell basis, and has found applications in a plethora of problems related to stabiliser states and measures of magic. However, it was not known how to generalise the procedure from qubits to $d$-level systems -- qudits -- for all dimensions $d > 2$ in a useful way. Indeed, a prior work of the authors (arXiv'24) showed that the natural extension of Bell sampling to arbitrary dimensions fails to provide meaningful information about the quantum states being measured. In this paper, we overcome the difficulties encountered in previous works and develop a useful generalisation of Bell sampling to qudits of all $d\geq 2$. At the heart of our primitive is a new unitary, based on Lagrange's four-square theorem, that maps four copies of any stabiliser state $|\mathcal{S}\rangle$ to four copies of its complex conjugate $|\mathcal{S}^\ast\rangle$ (up to some Pauli operator), which may be of independent interest. We then demonstrate the utility of our new Bell sampling technique by lifting several known results from qubits to qudits for any $d\geq 2$: 1. Learning stabiliser states in $O(n^3)$ time with $O(n)$ samples; 2. Solving the Hidden Stabiliser Group Problem in $\tilde{O}(n^3/\varepsilon)$ time with $\tilde{O}(n/\varepsilon)$ samples; 3. Testing whether $|ψ\rangle$ has stabiliser size at least $d^t$ or is $\varepsilon$-far from all such states in $\tilde{O}(n^3/\varepsilon)$ time with $\tilde{O}(n/\varepsilon)$ samples; 4. Clifford circuits with at most $n/2$ single-qudit non-Clifford gates cannot prepare pseudorandom states; 5. Testing whether $|ψ\rangle$ has stabiliser fidelity at least $1-\varepsilon_1$ or at most $1-\varepsilon_2$ with $O(d^2/\varepsilon_2)$ samples if $\varepsilon_1 = 0$ or $O(d^2/\varepsilon_2^2)$ samples if $\varepsilon_1 = O(d^{-2})$.

Jonathan Allcock, Yassine Hamoudi, Antoine Joux et al.

Subset-Sum is an NP-complete problem where one must decide if a multiset of $n$ integers contains a subset whose elements sum to a target value $m$. The best-known classical and quantum algorithms run in time $\tilde{O}(2^{n/2})$ and $\tilde{O}(2^{n/3})$, respectively, based on the well-known meet-in-the-middle technique. Here we introduce a novel classical dynamic-programming-based data structure with applications to Subset-Sum and a number of variants, including Equal-Sums (where one seeks two disjoint subsets with the same sum), 2-Subset-Sum (a relaxed version of Subset-Sum where each item in the input set can be used twice in the summation), and Shifted-Sums, a generalization of both of these variants, where one seeks two disjoint subsets whose sums differ by some specified value. Given any modulus $p$, our data structure can be constructed in time $O(n^2p)$, after which queries can be made in time $O(n^2)$ to the lists of subsets summing to any value modulo $p$. We use this data structure in combination with variable-time amplitude amplification and a new quantum pair finding algorithm, extending the quantum claw finding algorithm to the multiple solutions case, to give an $O(2^{0.504n})$ quantum algorithm for Shifted-Sums, an improvement on the best-known $O(2^{0.773n})$ classical running time. Incidentally, we obtain new $\tilde{O}(2^{n/2})$ and $\tilde{O}(2^{n/3})$ classical and quantum algorithms for Subset-Sum, not based on the seminal meet-in-the-middle method. We also study Pigeonhole Equal-Sums and Pigeonhole Modular Equal-Sums, where the existence of a solution is guaranteed by the pigeonhole principle. For the former problem, we give faster classical and quantum algorithms with running time $\tilde{O}(2^{n/2})$ and $\tilde{O}(2^{2n/5})$, respectively. For the more general modular problem, we give a classical algorithm that also runs in time $\tilde{O}(2^{n/2})$.

Yassine Hamoudi, Patrick Rebentrost, Ansis Rosmanis et al.

Submodular functions are set functions mapping every subset of some ground set of size $n$ into the real numbers and satisfying the diminishing returns property. Submodular minimization is an important field in discrete optimization theory due to its relevance for various branches of mathematics, computer science and economics. The currently fastest strongly polynomial algorithm for exact minimization [LSW15] runs in time $\widetilde{O}(n^3 \cdot \mathrm{EO} + n^4)$ where $\mathrm{EO}$ denotes the cost to evaluate the function on any set. For functions with range $[-1,1]$, the best $ε$-additive approximation algorithm [CLSW17] runs in time $\widetilde{O}(n^{5/3}/ε^{2} \cdot \mathrm{EO})$. In this paper we present a classical and a quantum algorithm for approximate submodular minimization. Our classical result improves on the algorithm of [CLSW17] and runs in time $\widetilde{O}(n^{3/2}/ε^2 \cdot \mathrm{EO})$. Our quantum algorithm is, up to our knowledge, the first attempt to use quantum computing for submodular optimization. The algorithm runs in time $\widetilde{O}(n^{5/4}/ε^{5/2} \cdot \log(1/ε) \cdot \mathrm{EO})$. The main ingredient of the quantum result is a new method for sampling with high probability $T$ independent elements from any discrete probability distribution of support size $n$ in time $O(\sqrt{Tn})$. Previous quantum algorithms for this problem were of complexity $O(T\sqrt{n})$.