9.7SYMar 31
Large-Signal Stability of Power Systems with Mixtures of GFL, GFM and GSP InvertersYifan Zhang, Yaoxin Wang, Yunjie Gu et al.
Grid-following (GFL) inverters have very different large-signal stability characteristics to synchronous generators, and convenient concepts such as the equal-area criterion and global energy function do not apply in the same way. Existing studies mainly focus on the synchronization stability of an individual GFL inverter, while interactions between multiple inverters are less often addressed. This paper elucidates the interaction mechanisms between heterogeneous inverters, covering GFL, grid-forming (GFM), and grid-supporting (GSP) types, to determine the stability boundaries of systems with mixed inverter compositions. The generalized large-signal model for two-inverter systems is derived for various inverter combinations. This paper establishes that systems containing GFL inverters do not admit a global energy function, fundamentally limiting the applicability of traditional direct methods. To overcome this barrier, a manifold method is employed to accurately determine the region of attraction (ROA). To address the computational complexity of the manifold method, reduced-order models of inverter are used based on multiscale analysis. The large-signal stability margin is assessed by the shortest distance from a stable equilibrium point (SEP) to the boundary of the ROA, which is called the stability radius (SR). Using the proposed framework, the analysis reults of two-inverter system show that both GFM and GSP inverters significantly enhance the large-signal stability of a two-inverter system where the other inverter is GFL, with GFM providing slightly superior performance. This improvement is attributed to the voltage support effects and is maximized when the GFM or GSP inverter is located at the midpoint of the transmission line, where the voltage is lowest. All findings in this paper are validated through both EMT simulations and power hardware-in-the-loop (PHIL) experiments.
1.2SYNov 12, 2015
Smart Transmission Network Emergency ControlThanh Long Vu, Hsiao-Dong Chiang, Konstantin Turitsyn
Power systems normally operate at their stable operating conditions where the power supply and demand are balanced. In emergency situations, the operators proceed to cut a suitable amount of loads to rebalance the supply-demand and hopefully stabilize the system. This traditional emergency control scheme results in interrupted service with severely economic damages to customers. In order to provide seamless electricity service to customers, this paper proposes a viable alternative for traditional remedial controls of power grids by exploiting the plentiful transmission facilities. In particular, we consider two emergency control schemes involving adjustment of the susceptance of a number of selected transmission lines to drive either fault-on dynamics or post-fault dynamics, and thereby stabilize the system under emergency situations. The corresponding emergency control problems will be formulated and partly solved in some specific cases. Simple numerical simulation will be used to illustrate the concept of this paper.
Adaptive Learning Rate and Momentum for Training Deep Neural NetworksZhiyong Hao, Yixuan Jiang, Huihua Yu et al.
Recent progress on deep learning relies heavily on the quality and efficiency of training algorithms. In this paper, we develop a fast training method motivated by the nonlinear Conjugate Gradient (CG) framework. We propose the Conjugate Gradient with Quadratic line-search (CGQ) method. On the one hand, a quadratic line-search determines the step size according to current loss landscape. On the other hand, the momentum factor is dynamically updated in computing the conjugate gradient parameter (like Polak-Ribiere). Theoretical results to ensure the convergence of our method in strong convex settings is developed. And experiments in image classification datasets show that our method yields faster convergence than other local solvers and has better generalization capability (test set accuracy). One major advantage of the paper method is that tedious hand tuning of hyperparameters like the learning rate and momentum is avoided.