Hannah Lu

NA
h-index10
3papers
26citations
Novelty32%
AI Score20

3 Papers

2.3NAJun 27, 2023
Learning Nonautonomous Systems via Dynamic Mode Decomposition

Hannah Lu, Daniel M. Tartakovsky

We present a data-driven learning approach for unknown nonautonomous dynamical systems with time-dependent inputs based on dynamic mode decomposition (DMD). To circumvent the difficulty of approximating the time-dependent Koopman operators for nonautonomous systems, a modified system derived from local parameterization of the external time-dependent inputs is employed as an approximation to the original nonautonomous system. The modified system comprises a sequence of local parametric systems, which can be well approximated by a parametric surrogate model using our previously proposed framework for dimension reduction and interpolation in parameter space (DRIPS). The offline step of DRIPS relies on DMD to build a linear surrogate model, endowed with reduced-order bases (ROBs), for the observables mapped from training data. Then the offline step constructs a sequence of iterative parametric surrogate models from interpolations on suitable manifolds, where the target/test parameter points are specified by the local parameterization of the test external time-dependent inputs. We present a number of numerical examples to demonstrate the robustness of our method and compare its performance with deep neural networks in the same settings.

4.6LGFeb 4, 2022
Machine Learning in Heterogeneous Porous Materials

Marta D'Elia, Hang Deng, Cedric Fraces et al.

The "Workshop on Machine learning in heterogeneous porous materials" brought together international scientific communities of applied mathematics, porous media, and material sciences with experts in the areas of heterogeneous materials, machine learning (ML) and applied mathematics to identify how ML can advance materials research. Within the scope of ML and materials research, the goal of the workshop was to discuss the state-of-the-art in each community, promote crosstalk and accelerate multi-disciplinary collaborative research, and identify challenges and opportunities. As the end result, four topic areas were identified: ML in predicting materials properties, and discovery and design of novel materials, ML in porous and fractured media and time-dependent phenomena, Multi-scale modeling in heterogeneous porous materials via ML, and Discovery of materials constitutive laws and new governing equations. This workshop was part of the AmeriMech Symposium series sponsored by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine and the U.S. National Committee on Theoretical and Applied Mechanics.

1.2NAMay 5, 2019
Predictive Accuracy of Dynamic Mode Decomposition

Hannah Lu, Daniel M. Tartakovsky

Dynamic mode decomposition (DMD), which the family of singular-value decompositions (SVD), is a popular tool of data-driven regression. While multiple numerical tests demonstrated the power and efficiency of DMD in representing data (i.e., in the interpolation mode), applications of DMD as a predictive tool (i.e., in the extrapolation mode) are scarce. This is due, in part, to the lack of rigorous error estimators for DMD-based predictions. We provide a theoretical error estimator for DMD extrapolation of numerical solutions to linear and nonlinear parabolic equations. This error analysis allows one to monitor and controls the errors associated with DMD-based temporal extrapolation of numerical solutions to parabolic differential equations. We use several computational experiments to verify the robustness of our error estimators and to compare the predictive ability of DMD with that of proper orthogonal decomposition (POD), another member of the SVD family. Our analysis demonstrates the importance of a proper selection of observables, as predicted by the Koopman operator theory. In all the tests considered, DMD outperformed POD in terms of efficiency due to its iteration-free feature. In some of these experiments, POD proved to be more accurate than DMD. This suggests that DMD is preferable for obtaining a fast prediction with slightly lower accuracy, while POD should be used if the accuracy is paramount.