Julian D. Santamaria

Julian D. Santamaria, Claudia Isaza, Jhony H. Giraldo

Wildlife monitoring is crucial for studying biodiversity loss and climate change. Camera trap images provide a non-intrusive method for analyzing animal populations and identifying ecological patterns over time. However, manual analysis is time-consuming and resource-intensive. Deep learning, particularly foundation models, has been applied to automate wildlife identification, achieving strong performance when tested on data from the same geographical locations as their training sets. Yet, despite their promise, these models struggle to generalize to new geographical areas, leading to significant performance drops. For example, training an advanced vision-language model, such as CLIP with an adapter, on an African dataset achieves an accuracy of 84.77%. However, this performance drops significantly to 16.17% when the model is tested on an American dataset. This limitation partly arises because existing models rely predominantly on image-based representations, making them sensitive to geographical data distribution shifts, such as variation in background, lighting, and environmental conditions. To address this, we introduce WildIng, a Wildlife image Invariant representation model for geographical domain shift. WildIng integrates text descriptions with image features, creating a more robust representation to geographical domain shifts. By leveraging textual descriptions, our approach captures consistent semantic information, such as detailed descriptions of the appearance of the species, improving generalization across different geographical locations. Experiments show that WildIng enhances the accuracy of foundation models such as BioCLIP by 30% under geographical domain shift conditions. We evaluate WildIng on two datasets collected from different regions, namely America and Africa. The code and models are publicly available at https://github.com/Julian075/CATALOG/tree/WildIng.

Héctor Laria, Yiping Han, Julian D. Santamaria et al.

Adapting pre-trained text-to-image diffusion models, whether to learn new visual concepts or erase unwanted ones, is routinely evaluated on its intended effects alone. We argue this framing is incomplete. Through sparse autoencoder analysis and zero-shot classification, we demonstrate that adaptation systematically damages semantically unrelated concepts in ways that aggregate metrics structurally cannot surface: when damage is severe enough for FID and KID to respond, the model is already nearly unusable; when the model remains functional, FID and KID stay flat while specific classes silently suffer worst-case zero-shot accuracy drops of up to 18.9 points and concept-level distributions shift dramatically. This pattern appears at both ends of the adaptation spectrum (concept customization and concept unlearning), suggesting it is a systematic consequence of weight-level modification rather than an artifact of any particular method. To surface this hidden drift before deployment, we introduce DriftScope, a prompt-level diagnostic tool that takes any two model checkpoints and returns a ranked list of tokens whose visual concepts have shifted most between them. DriftScope optimizes a soft prompt to attribute drift at the token level without requiring access to real data or model internals. The result is an interpretable, concept-level audit that aggregate evaluation cannot provide.