IRSep 14, 2023
When is a Foundation Model a Foundation ModelSaghir Alfasly, Peyman Nejat, Sobhan Hemati et al.
Recently, several studies have reported on the fine-tuning of foundation models for image-text modeling in the field of medicine, utilizing images from online data sources such as Twitter and PubMed. Foundation models are large, deep artificial neural networks capable of learning the context of a specific domain through training on exceptionally extensive datasets. Through validation, we have observed that the representations generated by such models exhibit inferior performance in retrieval tasks within digital pathology when compared to those generated by significantly smaller, conventional deep networks.
IVOct 4, 2023
Creating an Atlas of Normal Tissue for Pruning WSI Patching Through Anomaly DetectionPeyman Nejat, Areej Alsaafin, Ghazal Alabtah et al.
Patching gigapixel whole slide images (WSIs) is an important task in computational pathology. Some methods have been proposed to select a subset of patches as WSI representation for downstream tasks. While most of the computational pathology tasks are designed to classify or detect the presence of pathological lesions in each WSI, the confounding role and redundant nature of normal histology in tissue samples are generally overlooked in WSI representations. In this paper, we propose and validate the concept of an "atlas of normal tissue" solely using samples of WSIs obtained from normal tissue biopsies. Such atlases can be employed to eliminate normal fragments of tissue samples and hence increase the representativeness collection of patches. We tested our proposed method by establishing a normal atlas using 107 normal skin WSIs and demonstrated how established indexes and search engines like Yottixel can be improved. We used 553 WSIs of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) to show the advantage. We also validated our method applied to an external dataset of 451 breast WSIs. The number of selected WSI patches was reduced by 30% to 50% after utilizing the proposed normal atlas while maintaining the same indexing and search performance in leave-one-patinet-out validation for both datasets. We show that the proposed normal atlas shows promise for unsupervised selection of the most representative patches of the abnormal/malignant WSI lesions.
CVMay 22
CRISP -- Clustering-Based Redundancy-Reduced Instance Sampling for Pathology Case Representation and RetrievalZahra Rahimi Afzal, Wataru Uegami, Saghir Alfasly et al.
Digital pathology archives increasingly contain multiple whole-slide images (WSIs) per case, capturing spatially distinct tumour regions and reflecting intrinsic morphological heterogeneity. However, most existing approaches rely on a single pathologist-selected slide, thereby discarding potentially informative evidence distributed across the remaining WSIs. To date, no autonomous framework has been proposed for comprehensive multi-WSI case processing. Here, we present an unsupervised framework for case-level analysis that integrates information from all available slides within a case. Rather than relying on a single designated slide, the proposed approach constructs case-level representations by selectively distilling informative patches across WSIs. We introduce Clustering-Based Redundancy-Reduced Instance Sampling for Pathology (CRISP), a two-stage framework that first reduces redundancy within individual WSIs and subsequently applies clustering-based sampling to select a compact yet representative set of patches for the entire case. The resulting patch set captures case-level heterogeneity while avoiding exhaustive processing of gigapixel images, and directly serves as a retrieval index. Using two Mayo Clinic breast cancer datasets for diagnosis and treatment planning, we demonstrate that CRISP consistently matches or surpasses the current standard practice of combined model and pathologist slide selection for patient/case search and retrieval. By automating case-level processing and eliminating subjective WSI selection, CRISP potentially enables the exploitation of clinically relevant information distributed across multiple WSIs that is currently overlooked.
IVJan 6, 2024
Analysis and Validation of Image Search Engines in HistopathologyIsaiah Lahr, Saghir Alfasly, Peyman Nejat et al.
Searching for similar images in archives of histology and histopathology images is a crucial task that may aid in patient matching for various purposes, ranging from triaging and diagnosis to prognosis and prediction. Whole slide images (WSIs) are highly detailed digital representations of tissue specimens mounted on glass slides. Matching WSI to WSI can serve as the critical method for patient matching. In this paper, we report extensive analysis and validation of four search methods bag of visual words (BoVW), Yottixel, SISH, RetCCL, and some of their potential variants. We analyze their algorithms and structures and assess their performance. For this evaluation, we utilized four internal datasets ($1269$ patients) and three public datasets ($1207$ patients), totaling more than $200,000$ patches from $38$ different classes/subtypes across five primary sites. Certain search engines, for example, BoVW, exhibit notable efficiency and speed but suffer from low accuracy. Conversely, search engines like Yottixel demonstrate efficiency and speed, providing moderately accurate results. Recent proposals, including SISH, display inefficiency and yield inconsistent outcomes, while alternatives like RetCCL prove inadequate in both accuracy and efficiency. Further research is imperative to address the dual aspects of accuracy and minimal storage requirements in histopathological image search.