Adam Haroon

Adam Haroon, Erick J. Rodríguez-Seda, Cody Fleming et al.

Safe reinforcement learning (RL) typically asks $\textit{what}$ an agent should do. We ask $\textit{when}$ it needs to act, and show that a single policy can jointly learn control inputs and communication-efficient timing decisions under a pointwise Lyapunov safety shield. We focus on stabilization around a known equilibrium, where CARE-based LQR backups, Lyapunov certificates, and classical Lyapunov-STC are well defined, enabling clean comparison against analytical baselines. A run-time assurance (RTA) layer overrides the policy via a one-step-ahead Lyapunov prediction and a precomputed LQR backup, providing a strictly stronger guarantee than constrained MDP methods that enforce safety only in expectation. On an inverted pendulum, cart--pole, and planar quadrotor, the learned policy achieves $1.91\times$, $1.45\times$, and $3.51\times$ higher mean inter-sample interval (MSI) than a Lyapunov-triggered baseline; a fixed LQR controller at the same average rate is unstable on all three plants, showing that adaptive timing, not a lower average rate, makes sparsity safe. A CARE-derived Lyapunov reward transfers across environments without redesign, with a single weight $w_c$ controlling the stability--communication tradeoff; ablations confirm the RTA shield is essential, with its removal reducing MSI by $1.27$--$1.84\times$ and degrading state norms. A preference-conditioned extension recovers the full tradeoff frontier from one model at $\tfrac{2}{11}$ of training compute, and SAC experiments show the results are algorithm-agnostic across discrete and continuous domains. A 12-state 3D quadrotor case study extends the framework to higher-dimensional systems where classical STC is intractable, and robustness to $\pm30\%$ mass variation and disturbances shows graceful degradation, with the RTA absorbing what the learned policy cannot.

Anush Lakshman S, Adam Haroon, Beiwen Li

Machine learning approaches for fringe projection profilometry (FPP) are hindered by the lack of large, diverse datasets and comprehensive benchmarking protocols. This paper introduces the first open-source, photorealistic synthetic dataset for FPP, generated using NVIDIA Isaac Sim with 15,600 fringe images and 300 depth reconstructions across 50 diverse objects. We benchmark four neural network architectures (UNet, Hformer, ResUNet, Pix2Pix) on single-shot depth reconstruction, revealing that all models achieve similar performance (58-77 mm RMSE) despite substantial architectural differences. Our results demonstrate fundamental limitations of direct fringe-to-depth mapping without explicit phase information, with reconstruction errors approaching 75-95\% of the typical object depth range. This resource provides standardized evaluation protocols enabling systematic comparison and development of learning-based FPP approaches.

Adam Haroon, Anush Lakshman, Cody Fleming et al.

Learning-based single-shot fringe projection profilometry (FPP) has been studied mostly at close range. The long-range regime (standoff beyond 1 m) remains largely unaddressed: inverse-square intensity falloff lowers fringe signal-to-noise ratio and degrades physical ground truth, the single-shot problem is ill-posed because fringe-order information is absent from one image, and these architectures have not been studied mechanistically. We present a diagnose-repair-verify study using mechanistic interpretability (MI) and conformal uncertainty quantification (UQ) as convergent diagnostics: they agree on one physical failure locus, driving and verifying an architectural repair. On a photorealistic synthetic benchmark (15,600 fringe images, 50 objects at 1.5-2.1 m), a best UNet baseline reaches 14.54 mm object mean absolute error (MAE). Three probes (linear probing, Grad-CAM, flat-plane out-of-distribution test) converge: the baseline solves the task via object-boundary shape priors rather than fringe-phase decoding. We repair this with PhiCalNet, which outputs wrapped phase rather than depth and applies a fixed differentiable calibration layer mapping phase to depth, removing the shape-prior solution from the hypothesis space architecturally rather than by a loss penalty. A physics-informed loss that enforces the same physics as a soft penalty on a depth-regressing network yields no measurable gain, isolating the architecture as the operative factor. PhiCalNet reduces object MAE 3.3x to 4.46 mm; the residual is carried by 0.103% of pixels at the +/-pi wrap discontinuity. Pixel-wise conformal UQ confirms the diagnosis: rejecting the top 5% of object pixels by snapshot disagreement cuts PhiCalNet RMSE by 64% (20.6->7.4 mm) versus 3.5% for the baseline. MI and UQ converge on the same failure locus.