Zubin Abraham

ML
h-index19
3papers
195citations
Novelty58%
AI Score39

3 Papers

LGOct 8, 2025
MLLM4TS: Leveraging Vision and Multimodal Language Models for General Time-Series Analysis

Qinghua Liu, Sam Heshmati, Zheda Mai et al.

Effective analysis of time series data presents significant challenges due to the complex temporal dependencies and cross-channel interactions in multivariate data. Inspired by the way human analysts visually inspect time series to uncover hidden patterns, we ask: can incorporating visual representations enhance automated time-series analysis? Recent advances in multimodal large language models have demonstrated impressive generalization and visual understanding capability, yet their application to time series remains constrained by the modality gap between continuous numerical data and discrete natural language. To bridge this gap, we introduce MLLM4TS, a novel framework that leverages multimodal large language models for general time-series analysis by integrating a dedicated vision branch. Each time-series channel is rendered as a horizontally stacked color-coded line plot in one composite image to capture spatial dependencies across channels, and a temporal-aware visual patch alignment strategy then aligns visual patches with their corresponding time segments. MLLM4TS fuses fine-grained temporal details from the numerical data with global contextual information derived from the visual representation, providing a unified foundation for multimodal time-series analysis. Extensive experiments on standard benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of MLLM4TS across both predictive tasks (e.g., classification) and generative tasks (e.g., anomaly detection and forecasting). These results underscore the potential of integrating visual modalities with pretrained language models to achieve robust and generalizable time-series analysis.

MLJul 25, 2017
Concept Drift Detection and Adaptation with Hierarchical Hypothesis Testing

Shujian Yu, Zubin Abraham, Heng Wang et al.

A fundamental issue for statistical classification models in a streaming environment is that the joint distribution between predictor and response variables changes over time (a phenomenon also known as concept drifts), such that their classification performance deteriorates dramatically. In this paper, we first present a hierarchical hypothesis testing (HHT) framework that can detect and also adapt to various concept drift types (e.g., recurrent or irregular, gradual or abrupt), even in the presence of imbalanced data labels. A novel concept drift detector, namely Hierarchical Linear Four Rates (HLFR), is implemented under the HHT framework thereafter. By substituting a widely-acknowledged retraining scheme with an adaptive training strategy, we further demonstrate that the concept drift adaptation capability of HLFR can be significantly boosted. The theoretical analysis on the Type-I and Type-II errors of HLFR is also performed. Experiments on both simulated and real-world datasets illustrate that our methods outperform state-of-the-art methods in terms of detection precision, detection delay as well as the adaptability across different concept drift types.

MLApr 4, 2015
Concept Drift Detection for Streaming Data

Heng Wang, Zubin Abraham

Common statistical prediction models often require and assume stationarity in the data. However, in many practical applications, changes in the relationship of the response and predictor variables are regularly observed over time, resulting in the deterioration of the predictive performance of these models. This paper presents Linear Four Rates (LFR), a framework for detecting these concept drifts and subsequently identifying the data points that belong to the new concept (for relearning the model). Unlike conventional concept drift detection approaches, LFR can be applied to both batch and stream data; is not limited by the distribution properties of the response variable (e.g., datasets with imbalanced labels); is independent of the underlying statistical-model; and uses user-specified parameters that are intuitively comprehensible. The performance of LFR is compared to benchmark approaches using both simulated and commonly used public datasets that span the gamut of concept drift types. The results show LFR significantly outperforms benchmark approaches in terms of recall, accuracy and delay in detection of concept drifts across datasets.