Xing Huang

Mehran Taghian, Yunke Peng, Xing Huang et al.

Large foundation models have become central to modern machine learning, with performance scaling predictably with model size and data. However, training and deploying such models incur substantial computational and memory costs, motivating the development of low-precision training techniques. Recent work has demonstrated that 4-bit floating-point (FP4) formats--such as MXFP4 and NVFP4--can be successfully applied to linear GEMM operations in large language models (LLMs), achieving up to 4x improvements in compute throughput and memory efficiency compared to higher-precision baselines. In this work, we investigate the recently proposed HiFloat4 FP4 format for Huawei Ascend NPUs and systematically compare it with MXFP4 in large-scale training settings. All experiments are conducted on Ascend NPU clusters, with linear and expert GEMM operations performed entirely in FP4 precision. We evaluate both dense architectures (e.g., Pangu and LLaMA-style models) and mixture-of-experts (MoE) models, where both standard linear layers and expert-specific GEMMs operate in FP4. Furthermore, we explore stabilization techniques tailored to FP4 training that significantly reduce numerical degradation, maintaining relative error within 1% of full-precision baselines while preserving the efficiency benefits of 4-bit computation. Our results provide a comprehensive empirical study of FP4 training on NPUs and highlight the practical trade-offs between FP4 formats in large-scale dense and MoE models.

Pietro Bini, Lin William Cong, Xing Huang et al.

Do generative AI models, particularly large language models (LLMs), exhibit systematic behavioral biases in economic and financial decisions? If so, how can these biases be mitigated? Drawing on the cognitive psychology and experimental economics literatures, we conduct the most comprehensive set of experiments to date$-$originally designed to document human biases$-$on prominent LLM families across model versions and scales. We document systematic patterns in LLM behavior. In preference-based tasks, responses become more human-like as models become more advanced or larger, while in belief-based tasks, advanced large-scale models frequently generate rational responses. Prompting LLMs to make rational decisions reduces biases.

Zaifan Jiang, Xing Huang, Chao Wei

Preference learning is a key technology for aligning language models with human values. Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is a model-based algorithm to optimize preference learning, which first fits a reward model for preference scores and then optimizes the generating policy with an on-policy PPO algorithm to maximize the reward. The processing of RLHF is complex, time-consuming, and unstable. The Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) algorithm uses an off-policy algorithm to directly optimize the generating policy and eliminates the need for a reward model. DPO is more data-efficient and stable. However, DPO has a drawback of overfitting to the preference data and ignoring the KL-regularization term when the preference is deterministic. Identity mapping Preference Optimization(IPO) uses a root-finding MSE loss to incorporate KL-regularization. However, both DPO and IPO fail to properly address the KL-regularization term because the support of the preference distribution is not equal to the reference distribution. In this paper, we propose a simple and intuitive off-policy preference optimization algorithm from an importance sampling view, which we call Maximum Preference Optimization (MPO). MPO incorporates the off-policy KL-regularization term, making regularization truly effective. MPO achieves the best of both worlds by combining the objectives of RLHF and IPO while being an off-policy algorithm. Furthermore, MPO eliminates the need for a reward model and reference policy, simplifying the learning process and reducing memory usage.