Xiaowei Jia

Yilong Dai, Shengyu Chen, Xiaowei Jia et al.

Partial differential equations (PDEs) govern nearly every physical process in science and engineering, yet solving them at scale remains prohibitively expensive. Generative AI has transformed language, vision, and protein science, but learned PDE solvers have not undergone a comparable shift. Existing paradigms each capture part of the problem. Physics-informed neural networks embed residual structure, yet they are often difficult to optimize in stiff, multiscale, or large-domain regimes. Neural operators amortize across instances, yet they commonly inherit a snapshot-prediction view of solving and can degrade over long rollouts. Diffusion-based solvers model uncertainty, yet they are often built on a solver template that still centers on state regression. We argue that the core issue is the abstraction used to train learned solvers. Many models are asked to predict states, while many scientific settings require modeling how uncertainty moves through constrained dynamics. The relevant object is transport over physically admissible futures. This motivates \emph{flow learners}: models that parameterize transport vector fields and generate trajectories through integration, echoing the continuous dynamics that define PDE evolution. This physics-to-physics alignment supports continuous-time prediction, native uncertainty quantification, and new opportunities for physics-aware solver design. We explain why transport-based learning offers a stronger organizing principle for learned PDE solving and outline the research agenda that follows from this shift.

Yilong Dai, Shengyu Chen, Ziyi Wang et al.

Partial differential equations (PDEs) are central to scientific modeling. Modern workflows increasingly rely on learning-based components to support model reuse, inference, and integration across large computational processes. Despite the emergence of various physics-aware data-driven approaches, the field still lacks a unified perspective to uncover their relationships, limitations, and appropriate roles in scientific workflows. To this end, we propose a unifying perspective to place two dominant paradigms: Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) and Neural Operators (NOs), within a shared design space. We organize existing methods from three fundamental dimensions: what is learned, how physical structures are integrated into the learning process, and how the computational load is amortized across problem instances. In this way, many challenges can be best understood as consequences of these structural properties of learning PDEs. By analyzing advances through this unifying view, our survey aims to facilitate the development of reliable learning-based PDE solvers and catalyze a synthesis of physics and data.