Sanjukta Roy

Jack Dippel, Max Dupré la Tour, April Niu et al.

We study the computational complexity of the map redistricting problem (gerrymandering). Mathematically, the electoral district designer (gerrymanderer) attempts to partition a weighted graph into $k$ connected components (districts) such that its candidate (party) wins as many districts as possible. Prior work has principally concerned the special cases where the graph is a path or a tree. Our focus concerns the realistic case where the graph is planar. We prove that the gerrymandering problem is solvable in polynomial time in $λ$-outerplanar graphs, when the number of candidates and $λ$ are constants and the vertex weights (voting weights) are polynomially bounded. In contrast, the problem is NP-complete in general planar graphs even with just two candidates. This motivates the study of approximation algorithms for gerrymandering planar graphs. However, when the number of candidates is large, we prove it is hard to distinguish between instances where the gerrymanderer cannot win a single district and instances where the gerrymanderer can win at least one district. This immediately implies that the redistricting problem is inapproximable in polynomial time in planar graphs, unless P=NP. This conclusion appears terminal for the design of good approximation algorithms -- but it is not. The inapproximability bound can be circumvented as it only applies when the maximum number of districts the gerrymanderer can win is extremely small, say one. Indeed, for a fixed number of candidates, our main result is that there is a constant factor approximation algorithm for redistricting unweighted planar graphs, provided the optimal value is a large enough constant.

Sougata Jana, Sanjukta Roy

We study illusion elimination problems on directed social networks where each vertex is colored either red or blue. A vertex is under \textit{majority illusion} if it has more red out-neighbors than blue out-neighbors when there are more blue vertices than red ones in the network. In a more general phenomenon of $p$-illusion, at least $p$ fraction of the out-neighbors (as opposed to $1/2$ for majority) of a vertex is red. In the directed illusion elimination problem, we recolor minimum number of vertices so that no vertex is under $p$-illusion, for $p\in (0,1)$. Unfortunately, the problem is NP-hard for $p =1/2$ even when the network is a grid. Moreover, the problem is NP-hard and W[2]-hard when parameterized by the number of recolorings for each $p \in (0,1)$ even on bipartite DAGs. Thus, we can neither get a polynomial time algorithm on DAGs, unless P=NP, nor we can get a FPT algorithm even by combining solution size and directed graph parameters that measure distance from acyclicity, unless FPT=W[2]. We show that the problem can be solved in polynomial time in structured, sparse networks such as outerplanar networks, outward grids, trees, and cycles. Finally, we show tractable algorithms parameterized by treewidth of the underlying undirected graph, and by the number of vertices under illusion.

Jiehua Chen, Sanjukta Roy

Answering an open question by Betzler et al. [Betzler et al., JAIR'13], we resolve the parameterized complexity of the multi-winner determination problem under two famous representation voting rules: the Chamberlin-Courant (in short CC) rule [Chamberlin and Courant, APSR'83] and the Monroe rule [Monroe, APSR'95]. We show that under both rules, the problem is W[1]-hard with respect to the sum $β$ of misrepresentations, thereby precluding the existence of any $f(β) \cdot |I|^{O(1)}$ -time algorithm, where $|I|$ denotes the size of the input instance.